Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Antier (Operation Token Mirrors defendants)
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 47 → 47 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 462054753
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-27T11:32:07.917Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-27T11:32:29.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-27T11:32:29.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- dqFuUzUyhAMRBxreBArq5urspCS9TupERtBJrVuoix8
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1508 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"29340c284c9664c9aad22712520c917a","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T11:32:07.381Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.1429,"investigation_id":"0577ce54-3f4d-445f-83c2-71cc492ec01c","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":47,"page_slug":"antier-operation-token-mirrors-defendants","prev_score":47,"reason":"The core facts on the page (the Sept 4, 2025 indictment, defendant roles, charges, penalties, the Singapore arrests and the March 30, 2026 announcement) were confirmed against the IRS-CI release (claim_findings[0-2], [4]). One claim could not be supported: the figure of 'more than 60 different cryptocurrencies' appears in neither the IRS release nor TRM (claim_findings[3]). One further claim, the October 2024 charges and $25 million seizure, could not be checked because the DOJ page would not load (claim_findings[5]). That finding is a coverage limit and is not counted against the page. Of 6 countable findings, 1 is unverifiable (about 17%), which falls in the minor-issues band, and the page's hedging on Antier's corporate identity and Sabby Singh's custody status was found appropriate.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":7,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}