Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Sky (MakerDAO)
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 58 → 58 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425207316
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-08T23:09:23.211Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- GMKsyhzHJw3ZAmexrgj2hG9XCgz2UPon4EtYkbp5oT32
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1171 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-08T23:09:22.998Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"a19f2993-f03b-4b55-ba33-7f77dadac14c","new_score":58,"page_slug":"sky-makerdao","prev_score":58,"reason":"The investigation page is broadly accurate and well-sourced, with no outright false claims and no link rot (two URLs redirect but content remains accessible; two return 403 paywalls but content is independently verifiable). The main accuracy issues are: the $6.65M bad debt figure for Black Thursday is contested across sources; the USDS freeze function claim overstates what was actually deployed at launch; the DSChief vulnerability date in the timeline is off by ~3 weeks; and the MKR penalty timeline conflates the May 2025 framework introduction (0% penalty) with the September 2025 penalty activation. The governance centralization section and Black Thursday/legal sections are the strongest parts of the page. Key coverage gaps are on-chain analytics, current financial health, and post-page governance developments.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}