Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T07:20:29.693Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"c34f3c80-b857-491a-a7d3-690b042fc2ed","new_score":10,"page_slug":"swan-treasury-sty-token","prev_score":18,"reason":"No claim on this page was found to be disputed — the reviewer independently fetched all cited articles, found them mutually consistent, and confirmed the page's direct quotation is verbatim and correctly attributed. The revision is triggered by two high-priority coverage gaps rather than by any factual error: the page never cites on-chain transaction hashes or wallet addresses that would let readers independently verify the exploit (coverage_gaps[0]), and it does not say whether Swan Treasury is still operating or whether liquidity has been pulled since the exploit, which matters for assessing whether the risk is ongoing (coverage_gaps[2]). Four claims were only partially supported: a minor paraphrase where the page says 'vault rights' but the source says 'treasury rights' (claim_findings[6]), an editorializing line attributed to unnamed 'security researchers' with no matching source quote (claim_findings[16]), and two 'as of August 20' statements footnoted only to July 31-dated articles, a citation-freshness mismatch the reviewer independently corroborated by search (claim_findings[19], claim_findings[20]). Separately, the source list includes coindesk.cc, an aggregator/imitation domain distinct from coindesk.com, which is not cited by any claim but its mere presence in a fact-check source list on a platform built around crypto risk and impersonation is worth flagging and removing.","score_delta":-8,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}