Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · CATFI Memecoin / Eth Father (Park)
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 2 → 2 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 422983024
- Off-chain at
- 2026-05-29T17:23:33.123Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 5KaoEH33X9vEKUyagU5QbNWpgmGNWYgsjnH4TnYx9YrU
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1010 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-05-29T17:23:32.984Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"114254dd-e881-4ac9-bf57-fa89473ff9f1","new_score":2,"page_slug":"catfi-memecoin-eth-father-park","prev_score":2,"reason":"The core factual claims about the CATFI rug pull — token, blockchain, platform, surge multiple, losses, victim count, suspect surname and alias, charging date, prosecutor, and legal act — are well-corroborated by multiple independent sources. The principal concern is that the page's Section 4 cites sources about the May 2024 GCR hack involving a different token ('CAT') and a different team, not CATFI; if the page asserts or implies a connection between the CATFI/Park group and the GCR hack, that claim is not supported by any credible source found. All section content fields are empty, making claim-level verification partially inferential.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}