Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Jimbos Protocol
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 48 → 48 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 466749731
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-08T02:37:12.221Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-08T02:37:21.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-08T02:37:21.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- CvEP77BGGLvyGCQXo1rfrqJStx1cPoyYKtEweN13WnQY
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1329 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"e0df03a69d6e4f9bb0ffe26d129e3592","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-11-08T02:37:11.955Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.2857,"investigation_id":"bac1a051-a905-472d-8f30-1c63ac9db652","judge_def_hash":"750934ecb48272224909b7430fab271676d391380fbc821acbe7ee7e4cac2fa3","new_score":48,"page_slug":"jimbos-protocol","prev_score":48,"reason":"The core facts of the page (28 May 2023 exploit, 4,090 ETH, about $7.5M, flash loan, laundering through Tornado Cash) were confirmed (claim_findings[3], [4]). Two of seven claims could not be verified (claim_findings[2] Stargate/Celer bridging, claim_findings[6] the V1-to-V2 gap), which gives a disputed share of about 29%. One claim is out of date: Tornado Cash is described as sanctioned although OFAC delisted it in March 2025 (claim_findings[0]). The reviewer spot-checked only a few sources and reported moderate confidence, so the penalty stays at the lower end of the minor band. The page already discloses the exploit and the one omission found (V1 abandonment) is minor.","reviewer_def_hash":"3839668b232611e5b26db72079d64745f8e57e919b8a379e79b44ba4a52c845b","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}