Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Vanilla Drainer (DaaS)
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 0 → 0 (-10)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425401586
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-09T20:37:36.494Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- C9Swpv1xN9wHJdSw7yBvVkwCqi4eePw8kwRDr5RqmF3s
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1416 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-09T20:37:36.338Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"f2c745b0-36ba-4a14-a44e-aa3d54016ba3","new_score":0,"page_slug":"vanilla-drainer-daas","prev_score":0,"reason":"The review found no outright disputed claims across 28 fact-checked items. However, four claims were rated partially_supported (claim_findings[3], claim_findings[5], claim_findings[7], claim_findings[15]), all centering on two issues: the commission rate (the page states 15-20% while the authoritative SEAL Tier 1 source states a flat 20%), and the attribution of $494M in 2024 industry losses jointly to Inferno and Angel Drainer, which overstates those two services' combined share. Two claims (claim_findings[17], claim_findings[27]) are unverifiable because the primary Darkbit X thread cannot be independently fetched, and two citations (claim_findings[28], claim_findings[29]) are confirmed link rot — notably the CoinTelegraph primary cited in five sections. The page should revise the commission rate language to align with the SEAL primary source, correct the Inferno/Angel market share framing, and address the two high-priority coverage gaps (independent on-chain fee wallet verification and cumulative lifetime losses) flagged by the reviewer.","score_delta":-10,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}