Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Trezor
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 62 → 57 (-5)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 424317591
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-04T20:39:55.870Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 2YWGBx4evUGDFWa5b9uyLUE36dovRa9P8zJzBhM9pmcB
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1172 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-04T20:39:55.669Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"3f8ad1aa-b016-4d23-bc55-23c6bfeee1c4","new_score":57,"page_slug":"trezor","prev_score":62,"reason":"17 of 24 claims are fully confirmed by independent Tier 1 sources, and no link rot was detected. The page is approved with a minor score penalty for one disputed finding and four partially-supported findings. The single disputed claim (claim_findings[22]) states that Trezor patched the Ledger Donjon Safe 3 vulnerability via firmware update; Trezor's own official vulnerability disclosure (Tier 1) explicitly states the flaw was not patchable via firmware. Additionally, claim_findings[18] mischaracterizes the March 2024 X account compromise mechanism as a spoofed Twitter login page capturing credentials, when Trezor's Tier 1 blog confirms it was a malicious Calendly app authorization — a meaningful technical distinction. These errors are correctable without affecting the page's overall integrity or core conclusions.","score_delta":-5,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}