Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · Luiz Carlos Capuci Jr.
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#2
Score
2 → 2 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
443516746
Off-chain at
2026-08-25T19:34:46.969Z
Anchored at
—
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
FBKJC1J1bx6FmuRFX6N2Zu8h9y1wLtvr9Y9vUadbYvxG
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1146 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-25T19:34:46.837Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"01a64e3e-f95d-45c8-bbbf-9b972e9f0196","new_score":2,"page_slug":"luiz-carlos-capuci-jr","prev_score":2,"reason":"The page's core factual architecture — the SEC civil case, the DOJ criminal indictment, the August 2025 $46 million default judgment, and the Brazil enforcement action — is well supported by primary and high-credibility secondary sources and cross-checks consistently against independent reporting, with careful and accurate ALLEGED/pending framing throughout and no fabricated citations detected. The main defects found are a flat, unqualified assertion that Capuci (not just Pires) was arrested in Brazil, when the page's own cited source explicitly says this was unconfirmed at the time, and an unsourced-as-stated '$11 million diverted to personal wallets' figure that appears to be the page's own combination of two other cited figures rather than an independently documented statistic.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}