Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-26T16:05:22.047Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"17bbcf97-bc64-48ce-b4df-ec30114a0548","new_score":0,"page_slug":"credix-protocol-exit-scam","prev_score":2,"reason":"The core factual chain of this incident — a $4.5M privilege-escalation exploit of a month-old lending protocol, a broken 24-48 hour repayment promise, and the team's subsequent disappearance — is well corroborated across multiple independent, credible outlets (claim_findings[0], [1], [12]). However, the review found that the page's slug and title state 'exit scam' as an established fact, while every source it cites, and every other source the reviewer checked, describes the outcome only as suspected, alleged, or unconfirmed, with no regulator, court, or law-enforcement finding of fraud to date (claim_findings[3]). The review also found a security-audit citation that appears to document an unrelated, years-older project of a similar name rather than the entity under investigation (claim_findings[18]), a misspelled partner-protocol name (claim_findings[14]), a statistic correctly reported but attributed to the wrong outlet (claim_findings[21]), and an absence of a competing technical analysis that reads the same evidence as an external hack rather than an inside job (coverage_gaps[1]). None of these issues call the underlying event into question, but together they show a pattern of the page stating more certainty than its sourcing supports and require correction rather than removal.","score_delta":-14,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}