Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Sirio Finance
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 53 → 53 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 463283724
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-30T12:23:14.563Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-30T12:23:17.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-30T12:23:17.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 6HP23fcy3byFkZGRuNRg8jp8YonGmpx2jXszWky2PZSn
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1267 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"1a2026c7bc9cc71e521ca23f53d0a17f","decided_at":"2026-10-30T12:23:14.514Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.4286,"findings_hash":"A7MRUppEqHoj9YFt8aqBjhACpqQa3oa2RwVKhGQ15sJb","investigation_id":"387ed05b-91c6-4dc9-9195-af8cc69d4052","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":53,"omissions":{"material":1,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"53f3735c36152805996cc9de8d478280c20198ab5930f302a393dd03839199c8","page_slug":"sirio-finance","prev_score":53,"reason":"The exploit date, flashloan technique, roughly $2m loss, launch date and TVL figure are supported. The QuillAudits reentrancy-guard causation is presented as an analysis finding but rests on anonymous reviews and team posts, and a few details (first lending protocol, 20 features, active website) were not found. The page omits DefiLlama's deprecated status. Many sources were unreadable, so the review is limited.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"exploited","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}