Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T13:52:01.134Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"913c528b-8895-480e-9a55-348543b6fcca","new_score":6,"page_slug":"coreum-xrpl-bridge-exploit-august-2026","prev_score":12,"reason":"Of the 52 claims checked, 42 were confirmed and only 2 were disputed, putting the raw disputed rate at about 6% — within approval range by itself. But the page's central loss figure, 199,916.3 XRP, is repeated seven times throughout the page (claim_findings[1],[18],[20],[21],[40],[43],[47]) without noting that tx's own technical lead publicly confirmed a different total, 198,715.88 XRP, a roughly 1,200 XRP gap the reviewer could not resolve and flagged as a high-priority coverage gap rather than a disputed claim. Paired with a second high-priority gap — the page cites no wallet addresses or transaction hashes at all for a fully public, independently verifiable on-chain event — this is enough to warrant a revision request, even though the technical narrative of the exploit (the deposit-verification flaw, the 17-of-28 relayer quorum, the 94-transaction/97-minute timeline, and the correct, repeated finding that the XRP Ledger itself and Ripple Labs were unaffected) is well corroborated by multiple independent outlets and tx's own statements. A separate, minor error — the claim that August 11 was XRP's 'first sub-$1 level since January 2024,' contradicted by other reporting pointing to November 2024 (claim_findings[32] and [50], same underlying error counted once) — is background market color, not a core allegation, and carries little weight on its own.","score_delta":-6,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}