Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Sequence
#2
Score
22 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
443517981
Off-chain at
2026-08-25T22:46:49.558Z
Anchored at
Block time

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
BPJLuBKckiWim7T9RYkREHa1c94uuezmT6d8sYidWuqX
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1059 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-25T22:46:49.391Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"c085b4ca-51b9-4be4-bcf4-a89fd7148bed","new_score":2,"page_slug":"siavash-kayvanpour","prev_score":2,"reason":"The page's central claims — Kayvanpour's personal OFAC/E.O. 13224 designation on August 7, 2026, the designated corporate network, the IRGC/Nobitex dollar flows, and the $4B/$676M Reuters figures — are all confirmed against primary and independent sources. One section (Dubai Regulatory Actions Against Shelbit) inverts the sequence of VARA's January 2025 cease-and-desist order and July 2026 monetary fine, a reversal contradicted by both the regulator's own notice and the page's own cited source. Several claims involving the living individual's criminal conviction omit that it was rendered in absentia, and the timeline attaches unsupported precise dates to events sources only date to a year or month.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}