Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · AnubisDAO
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 2 → 2 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 461973748
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-27T06:44:49.518Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-27T06:45:23.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-27T06:45:23.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- FuP2X59t1eESzgHePBt9k3dorUJjVz85w2suyDwja3Pv
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1463 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"c52e06e164c4868fa3e49e417e891717","decided_at":"2026-10-27T06:44:49.343Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.4,"findings_hash":"ANYqHthxxK1h2dvPAPyCqqrFSmdkk4MjAkMfbHsLi5fH","investigation_id":"14f590e2-8d66-4af0-a96f-2f8b300fef26","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":2,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"b305fd79a5550e25e5bc9f6b39797d429ede304510975039449eec75678d6e99","page_slug":"anubisdao","prev_score":2,"reason":"The core narrative (about $60M raised, pool drained about 20 hours in, competing phishing and rogue-developer accounts, ZachXBT's attribution to Beerus and Ersan, no charges) is supported by the sources checked. The main error is a conflation of the June 2022 1,018 ETH laundering with the July 15-16, 2023 100 ETH batches, which creates a false 'reports differ' discrepancy and a misdated timeline entry. The Tornado Cash sanctions framing is stale after the March 2025 delisting. Several claims, including the 9,500 ETH and 'largest depositor' figures and Sisyphus quotes, were not verified against the cited sources.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"subject_status":"shut_down","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}