Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · TexCat
- Sequence
- #6
- Score
- 0 → 0 (-12)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464109023
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-01T13:28:14.748Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-01T13:28:44.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-01T13:28:44.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 6uWPuhVPrwRb4U3sCNNfe7kWDbSpwNo7Ereio4Bqhtzb
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1527 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"6b0b0562a1629566af18fe3f97c66ec3","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T13:28:14.480Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.125,"investigation_id":"7a9e565d-b19d-4921-9eed-3ebdf264b9cd","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":0,"page_slug":"texcat","prev_score":0,"reason":"Of 9 claim findings, 1 was excluded because the source blocked the reviewer (claim_findings[7]). Of the remaining 8, one claim could not be found or checked (claim_findings[5]), giving 12.5% disputed or unverifiable, which is the minor band. Three further findings are stale and share one cause: the official pair's DEXT Score is now 75/100, not the 0/100 the page states in its summary and in two sections (claim_findings[1], [2], [3]). Counted as one defect, this keeps the page in the minor band. It is still a headline figure in the summary, so the penalty sits at the stricter end. The reviewer also gave a high-priority coverage gap on missing on-chain analysis (mint and freeze authority, holder concentration, liquidity lock). No omissions or status contradictions were found; the token is still trading with no exploit or enforcement reported.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":-12,"scored_claims":8,"sequence_num":6,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}