Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · ParaSpace Lending V1
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 50 → 50 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464368716
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T04:55:54.803Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T04:56:26.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T04:56:26.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 4KRuuxgKA55oCjamPniG3mfUZyKk3NDTEUvyP5JybUfu
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1916 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"02eb6e4ef9225274a59b5c99296b8ae5","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-11-02T04:55:54.586Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.1667,"investigation_id":"e8bddd4e-2f5b-4829-9385-e7c7db3f5ffe","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":50,"page_slug":"paraspace-lending-v1","prev_score":50,"reason":"The core March 2023 exploit account matches BlockSec on date and flash loan size (claim_findings[0]), and the Parallel Finance rebrand is confirmed (claim_findings[5]). However, the page omits the operator's 2025 sunset and 1 August 2025 shutdown with full liquidation, so its 'minimal TVL' framing is stale (claim_findings[4], omission_findings[0], subject_status). The '373%' figure contradicts its own cited numbers (about +274%), the CEO misappropriation amount differs from The Defiant's headline ($1.7M vs $2.7M), and the recovery and slippage details could not be confirmed. Because the shutdown rests on a snippet of a notice the reviewer could not open, the penalty is moderate rather than severe.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":4,"severity_override":{"applied":true,"band":"significant","from_band":"minor","reason":"The claim percentage (1 of 6 unverifiable, about 17%) implies the minor band, but the review reports a critical omission and a status contradiction: the operator shut down ParaSpace V1 on 2025-08-01 and moved to full liquidation, while the page describes only low TVL and a rebrand. A further material omission concerns reported $500 NFT withdrawal fees. The shutdown evidence rests on search snippets, so the penalty stays in the lower part of the significant band."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}