Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Zedcex / Zedxion / Babak Morteza Zanjani (IRGC-linked exchanges)
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 0 → 0 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 425407476
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-09T21:16:20.185Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- AadGdeL9q3EVrwChzbDgiE8umg3qYwVfwZYR484jVAA2
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1419 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-09T21:16:19.991Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"525cde83-4b87-4aa3-b36a-370c4b02c035","new_score":0,"page_slug":"zedcex-zedxion-babak-morteza-zanjani-irgc-linked-exchanges","prev_score":0,"reason":"The reviewer examined 36 claims and found zero disputed or unverifiable findings. All 30 confirmed claims are backed by Tier 1 sources including OFAC official records, UK Companies House, FinCEN, OCCRP, and the Federal Register. The 6 partially_supported findings (claim_findings[7], [15], [34], [36], [37], [38]) are minor peripheral discrepancies: a source-to-source count variation in designated TRON addresses (5 vs 6 vs 7 depending on whether counts are per-entity or combined), a two-character order-number difference in the Israeli NBCTF seizure order (ASO-41/25 vs ASO-43/25 across sources), a standard year-placeholder date for Zanjani's 1970s arrest, a five-day date gap on the Israeli Zedcex designation, and a framing overstatement linking the $344M USDT freeze to Zedcex/Zedxion enforcement when it was a separate Central Bank of Iran action. None of these affect the page's core allegations. No link rot, no stale citations, no high-priority coverage gaps. The reviewer's confidence of 0.88 is well-grounded.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}