Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Saga
- Sequence
- #5
- Score
- 54 → 54 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 462277460
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-28T00:41:50.801Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-28T00:42:39.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-28T00:42:39.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 7FLTfyLGJuYDqghLbeLjNDiosbyPFU6KUgXfT5ztbHZu
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (2025 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"59dd4cc6ff80b546ae5e9e4a1da73d58","band_override":null,"decided_at":"2026-10-28T00:41:50.514Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.2727,"investigation_id":"9e1f237b-1644-4675-8fac-49a2afcd3c83","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":54,"page_slug":"saga","prev_score":54,"reason":"The core January 2026 exploit account (date, amount, addresses, Tornado Cash routing, inherited ICS20 flaw) is confirmed by Rekt, The Block and the Cosmos advisory (claim_findings[0], [1], [5]). By claim count alone, 3 of 11 findings are unverifiable, about 27%, which would be a minor band. However, the page does not say that SagaEVM is being permanently shut down (omission_findings[0], critical) or that SAGA pairs were delisted in September 2026 (omission_findings[1], material), so it presents the chain as merely paused. Other weaknesses are an unsupported implication that Saga was at fault for not patching (claim_findings[3]), a $7M versus $6.2M Tornado Cash inconsistency (claim_findings[6]), and a stale all-time-low price (claim_findings[7]). Reviewer confidence is moderate (0.6), so the penalty sits in the lower-middle of the band and the page is not delisted.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":5,"severity_override":{"applied":true,"band":"significant","from_band":"minor","reason":"omission_findings[0] is critical: SagaEVM, the exploited chainlet, is being permanently shut down (sunset from 2026-09-24, final cessation 2026-11-23, users must withdraw assets), and subject_status.contradicts_page is true because the page says only that the chain remained offline pending a post-mortem. The claim-level percentage (3 of 11, about 27%) understates this, so the significant band applies instead of minor."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}