Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
rescore · Binance
- Sequence
- #8
- Score
- 24 → 26 (+2)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 466738866
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-08T01:58:24.499Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-08T01:58:30.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-08T01:58:30.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 5wL21eyJZFnXnsZPjfiT16njfGTJ2jfX7iHsC79969dz
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (959 chars)
{"actor":"system","decided_at":"2026-11-08T01:58:23.184Z","decision":"rescore","investigation_id":"ee0b172d-1fd3-47c7-812a-115748f8108a","new_score":26,"page_slug":"binance","prev_score":24,"reason":"Re-read and rescored after the page was re-researched (2026-11-08). Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 24 → 26. Problems weighed by who is responsible: the subject's own conduct −120, concerns that are not fraud −21.6, incidents the subject suffered −20, problems around the subject, caused by others −2.9; legitimacy credit long-running +10; serious regulatory wrongdoing with no established harm to customers is held in WARNING (26–50); the penalty for incidents it suffered is capped at 20; a recent unresolved incident −27.6; accepted community evidence −1.7.","score_delta":2,"score_model":"v2","sequence_num":8,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}