Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · XT Exchange
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 22 → 22 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 462186571
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-27T19:19:35.181Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-27T19:19:42.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-27T19:19:42.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- GDkKAuE1NYjgpHfMYtbwucjV5nRXEYXjwT9oxa4ZDC4q
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1469 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"db3950763ca4d80913902e4dc6ba305a","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T19:19:35.047Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.375,"findings_hash":"7G7uTMu3fytLGCqqp8k9aN8p1XYMxzKc17BRTGMp1R9t","investigation_id":"1e2ac659-6a87-484f-acda-a0f0d7c781fa","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":22,"page_content_hash":"6da5b8990f963365961eb01538962947525eda26b05165f48fab7fce4810def5","page_slug":"xt-exchange","prev_score":22,"reason":"The main regulatory and hack claims (FCA, VARA, Thai SEC, the $1.7M hot wallet theft on 2024-11-28) are confirmed by primary or reputable sources. Weaker points: the hack cause is stated as fact when Halborn says 'most likely'; the 12-hour withdrawal halt, the Seychelles FSA notice date (2026-04-09), the Trustpilot score and the ZachXBT section are not verified; and the timeline treats the Thai block as having occurred when sources only describe it as scheduled. The subject appears still operating. Only a sample of claims was checked, and the user-complaint, volume and PoR sections were not individually verified.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":8,"sequence_num":2,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}