Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Sequence
#2
Score
22 → 22 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
462186571
Off-chain at
2026-10-27T19:19:35.181Z
Anchored at
2026-10-27T19:19:42.000Z
Block time
2026-10-27T19:19:42.000Z

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
GDkKAuE1NYjgpHfMYtbwucjV5nRXEYXjwT9oxa4ZDC4q
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1469 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"db3950763ca4d80913902e4dc6ba305a","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T19:19:35.047Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.375,"findings_hash":"7G7uTMu3fytLGCqqp8k9aN8p1XYMxzKc17BRTGMp1R9t","investigation_id":"1e2ac659-6a87-484f-acda-a0f0d7c781fa","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":22,"page_content_hash":"6da5b8990f963365961eb01538962947525eda26b05165f48fab7fce4810def5","page_slug":"xt-exchange","prev_score":22,"reason":"The main regulatory and hack claims (FCA, VARA, Thai SEC, the $1.7M hot wallet theft on 2024-11-28) are confirmed by primary or reputable sources. Weaker points: the hack cause is stated as fact when Halborn says 'most likely'; the 12-hour withdrawal halt, the Seychelles FSA notice date (2026-04-09), the Trustpilot score and the ZachXBT section are not verified; and the timeline treats the Thai block as having occurred when sources only describe it as scheduled. The subject appears still operating. Only a sample of claims was checked, and the user-complaint, volume and PoR sections were not individually verified.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":8,"sequence_num":2,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}