Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Decision
review · StablR
View on Solana ↗
Sequence
#9
Score
28 → 28 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
457925454
Off-chain at
2026-10-17T05:46:41.205Z
Anchored at
2026-10-17T05:46:50.571Z
Block time
—

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
5oo8rAcGjKddsBTRdRQmA6WHyy4VbbhPhQq4hJi9nrBC
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (2001 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"1c7764c5a66a1446f76a341549651f29","decided_at":"2026-10-17T05:46:41.063Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.4231,"findings_hash":"DpZuzGHuLqFCaYrtDTBM4KfH5sfk3tmCYrYvsvAPAoNR","investigation_id":"67c1f560-0143-47ba-8309-7ce127131ff6","mode":"findings_only","new_score":28,"page_content_hash":"baaf418450cdf139bd4d0e949e46b50bd9f9fbceed0ba6abea36af8752b8fd38","page_slug":"stablr","prev_score":28,"reason":"The core incident narrative (1-of-3 multisig key compromise, ~8.35M USDR/4.5M EURR minted, ~$13.5M face value, ~1,115 ETH/$2.8M net extracted, Blockaid's governance/key-management diagnosis, Oobit's freeze, StablR's MiCA 1:1 admission, DORA's scope) is well supported by the cited tier-2 outlets and holds up under independent verification. However, several secondary claims are not well supported: a market-cap/supply-increase statistic is misattributed to the Cryptonomist article (which contains no such data); the page's quoted May 26 statement was actually posted May 24 and is conflated with a later, separate statement; the EMI license date (June 21, 2024) conflicts with StablR's own press release (July 1, 2024) and is not supported by the cited WhoIsWho article at all; the reported '€3 billion' transaction volume appears to be a currency mislabeling of StablR's own 'US$3 billion' figure; and FinTelegram's Payvision allegation conflates a 2020 DNB investigation report with what FinTelegram's own letter to the EBA dates as a 2021 criminal complaint. One cited source (CoinReporter) is dead with no archive, and two archive.org snapshots (U.Today, Blockonomi) point to unrelated articles due to an apparent archiving-pipeline error. The page is current through May 26, 2026 but the review is conducted nearly five months later with no update on resolution, recovery, or regulatory follow-through.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":9,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}