Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Purrlend
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 49 → 49 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464350132
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-02T03:49:44.294Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-02T03:50:05.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-02T03:50:05.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- AAj8ktt8xY4YbEBqJQTVyii4FaawCyWYPzmxheekYqPC
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1308 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"587f9a1aec781927eebb560fe8eba4e2","decided_at":"2026-11-02T03:49:44.239Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.4167,"findings_hash":"GfXkK9vScktENFruTg8cuySjmG9mCfBxJuQkZLR59YpW","investigation_id":"39910c40-bf09-4d18-b078-4b9b70b813a6","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":49,"page_content_hash":"693e0c3dad6229d928ee7617215e7197a15f6f507674470e468fae81f3a593e0","page_slug":"purrlend","prev_score":49,"reason":"Core facts (April 25, 2026 exploit, about $1.52M loss, 2-of-3 multisig without timelock, bridge role, Kirby Ong flag, TVL drop) hold up against the fetched sources. Weaker points are the exact 1:20 a.m. UTC time, the 9:10 UTC pause time (possibly conflated with a publication timestamp), the unsourced 'inside job' community allegation, and the MegaETH figure, which sources disagree on ($324,549 vs about $163K). The status as of late May 2026 is stale and I could not establish the current status.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}