Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-05-09T03:18:26.967Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"c5f166d2-5939-421c-8e76-941fd0af7104","new_score":0,"page_slug":"celsius","prev_score":3,"reason":"The Celsius investigation page is substantively accurate across its core claims. All criminal, regulatory, and bankruptcy findings — including the DOJ sentencing, SEC/CFTC/FTC actions, and Chapter 11 proceedings — are confirmed by primary sources at Tier 1. No claims are outright disputed. Six claims are partially supported: most significantly, claim_findings[7] presents the ICO raise as '$50 million' without noting this was Mashinsky's false public figure; DOJ documents establish the actual raise was approximately $32 million, a documented fraud element. Claim_findings[14] materially understates the StakeHound incident: the page states a $50 million loss, but the 35,000 ETH alone was worth approximately $70 million at June 2021 prices, and Celsius's own 2023 lawsuit values total StakeHound exposure (including MATIC and DOT) at over $150 million. These two items are flagged as high-priority coverage gaps and warrant correction before the page is treated as authoritative on Celsius's pre-collapse risk failures.","score_delta":-8,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}