Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Sequence
#2
Score
28 → 28 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
464360165
Off-chain at
2026-11-02T04:25:25.479Z
Anchored at
2026-11-02T04:25:55.000Z
Block time
2026-11-02T04:25:55.000Z

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
HZ8K6qgJaUBBwYF79uDTBu5ppStu1QFTe9KTA9bpgzdV
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1433 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"0c012d6d4adfa684f40c69649bb60c25","decided_at":"2026-11-02T04:25:25.434Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.4286,"findings_hash":"8GQDz9zGfYgdVSzR3LHexTyJsP3grjZouJ5Czp8VEvah","investigation_id":"21390da5-8047-4693-b0f3-b16bc87f5225","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":28,"omissions":{"material":2,"total":2},"page_content_hash":"1784c2558942176a4c2365b5c5bcd1509ac786af86237ba639559a9c176e3448","page_slug":"elizaos-ai16z-eliza-labs","prev_score":28,"reason":"The page's narrative of the controversies is broadly consistent with the reporting I checked. It is materially out of date: by August 2026 the founder reported that the class action was settled, the token is dead and the foundation is winding down, and the page still calls the suit pending and the project active. There are also date and tokenomics discrepancies in the migration section: the announcement date is Sept 25, not Oct 8, and the official docs do not give the cited percentages or the 1.1B starting supply. Review sampled only a subset of the page's claims.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"subject_status":"shut_down","subject_status_contradicts_page":true,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}