Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_revise · Little Boy Plus - BSC DeFi Logic Exploit
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 10 → 3 (-7)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 465104418
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-04T00:42:41.595Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-04T00:43:13.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-04T00:43:13.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- B1BCEYEibuHyGRtPRR5WGJsdm22VRbgFujxPTw6kV1Gr
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1367 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"055eac0897b322d24db87a51305b2626","band_override":null,"blocked_count":2,"decided_at":"2026-11-04T00:42:41.259Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.1429,"investigation_id":"5b99fcf0-9008-45ab-a8ad-41c9f6e6ad40","judge_def_hash":"750934ecb48272224909b7430fab271676d391380fbc821acbe7ee7e4cac2fa3","new_score":3,"page_slug":"little-boy-plus-bsc-defi-logic-exploit","prev_score":10,"reason":"The core technical claims (loss figures, flash loan amounts, attacker addresses, transaction hash, block, date and the SlowMist mechanism) were confirmed against DARKNAVY and PANews (claim_findings[0-3], [7]). Of 9 findings, 2 were unverifiable only because Crypto Times blocked the reviewer (claim_findings[4], [6]) and are excluded; of the remaining 7, one unverifiable claim (claim_findings[8], no audit referenced) gives about 14% disputed, which falls in the minor band. The 'no statement' claim (claim_findings[5]) is dated to June 18 and is now months old. No contradictions or omissions were found, and the subject is correctly presented as exploited.","reviewer_def_hash":"3839668b232611e5b26db72079d64745f8e57e919b8a379e79b44ba4a52c845b","score_delta":-7,"scored_claims":7,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}