Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · Satsuma Technology plc
- Sequence
- #4
- Score
- 45 → 45 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 462185557
- Off-chain at
- 2026-10-27T19:15:33.638Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-10-27T19:16:07.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-10-27T19:16:07.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- U2aNUR96aUJWXnGLFUmeNAS84b7MxqqxVkqjSAoAJCf
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1566 chars)
{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"6983b267ce9de459c73153d84a0db247","band_override":null,"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T19:15:33.299Z","decision":"review_approve","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.0952,"investigation_id":"1b151b59-4a40-4cb8-aedb-02565e18d529","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":45,"page_slug":"satsuma-technology-plc","prev_score":45,"reason":"Of 22 claim findings, 1 (the Latham FCA prospectus date, claim_findings[20]) was source_blocked and left out, leaving 21. None were disputed and 2 were unverifiable (claim_findings[9] Tao Alpha date and claim_findings[19] share price peak), so about 9.5% are unresolved. The core claims (vote results, court approval, distribution amounts, BTC sales, audited loss, executive departures) were confirmed against official RNS filings and two independent outlets. Several partial findings remain for correction: the GBP 163.6m was raised from convertible loan note investors rather than 'shareholders' (claim_findings[6] and [7]), the rebrand is placed on the wrong timeline date (claim_findings[8]), and the GBP 71.9m aggregate does not reconcile with audited disposal proceeds (claim_findings[4]). The reviewer found no subject-status contradiction and only minor omissions.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":21,"sequence_num":4,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}