Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Raidparty
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 26 → 26 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464278921
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-01T23:35:27.004Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-01T23:35:48.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-01T23:35:48.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 9DXkZ1eQBc9CHDqxFQTmKpyTAJDYtB45frHkwWU39Up2
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1498 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"f4a158788a443d5860215cf55458bedc","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-01T23:35:26.934Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.2727,"findings_hash":"H4wwt5xchK5TfigBa4Gua78qPpRDnT5wJ2Cr2wuCw3Ly","investigation_id":"7b79f354-a2d8-4603-a216-e3808afb96a3","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":26,"omissions":{"material":0,"total":1},"page_content_hash":"4e2bc1b5f3b48704de248f0548a6881f6edf996d452cdc052c0bbacd93c83e87","page_slug":"raidparty","prev_score":26,"reason":"The core allegation (ZachXBT, 4,870 ETH, ~$70M, September 18 2026) and the on-chain facts (2,342 holders, zero value, eight upgrades, May 2024 last transaction, no audit) check out, and the page consistently frames the claims as unadjudicated allegations. The main error is the team member's name, given as 'Zarch' where the about page says 'Zarclead'; this undercuts the page's pseudonym-similarity discussion. Minor imprecisions: upgrade period ('late 2022'), placeholder 2022-12-31 date, and an embellishment on the sneaker-reselling description. Avark, Grokstreet and the 2022 timeline items were not verified.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":11,"sequence_num":3,"subject_status":"unknown","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}