Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · HEEBOO
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 62 → 62 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 443561849
- Off-chain at
- 2026-09-02T00:39:55.452Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- CdDVCv6baxVd7DBnoBirJyt47svFozPMq9GyredrZXWE
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1345 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"9423fb0588ef248e779ce8caff2187b5","decided_at":"2026-09-02T00:39:55.339Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0.1739,"investigation_id":"0dac514c-7a57-41e4-8164-d94248f26de2","new_score":62,"page_slug":"heeboo","prev_score":62,"reason":"The large majority of the page's factual claims -- founder/executive biographies, the Amazon Prime Video deal, the equity-options program, and especially the detailed $HEEBOO tokenomics -- were independently corroborated against primary sources (the official token page) and multiple independent trade-press outlets, with no contradictions found. A small number of claims (attribution of specific studio credits to two named founders vs. the wider team, the exact Popkins launch date, the precise date of the introductory X post, and the CoinGecko/CoinMarketCap listing status) are either imprecise or could not be independently confirmed, and are marked partially_supported or unverifiable rather than disputed. No evidence of fraud, rug-pull, or regulatory enforcement was found by this review, consistent with the page's own conclusion, though that remains an absence-of-evidence finding rather than a clean bill of health.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}