Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-25T22:09:09.006Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"bf6890ab-103f-42e0-9e2a-e5dc9d2237a5","new_score":13,"page_slug":"humanity-protocol-h-token-hack","prev_score":18,"reason":"The reviewer verified 34 discrete claims and found the page's core narrative -- a $36M private-key/opsec compromise, the cross-chain drain and unauthorized minting, the DPRK tooling attribution, and ZachXBT's staged-hack claim and retraction -- solidly supported by tier-1 and tier-2 sources (claim_findings[0-16], [18-20], [22], [24-28], [30-31]). Only 3 of 34 claims count against the disputed_pct formula (disputed + unverifiable / total), giving 8.8%, comfortably inside the approve range: claim_findings[21] and [29] misdate the comparator Bybit hack as 'February 2026' when it occurred in February 2025, and claim_findings[23] (no formal government attribution) is a reasonable but unconfirmable negative claim. A related claim about stolen funds not moving through centralized exchanges (claim_findings[17]) is marked stale, since later reporting showed partial movement to KuCoin, though staleness does not count toward the disputed threshold. None of these defects touch the page's central factual claims about the hack itself. However, coverage_gaps[0] is marked high priority: the page omits Humanity Protocol's subsequently reported pivot away from decentralized identity toward enterprise AI, a development directly relevant to assessing the entity's current status and risk profile on a platform built around ongoing trust scoring. That high-priority gap, not the disputed_pct, is what moves this page from approve to a revise recommendation.","score_delta":-5,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}