Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 22 → 22 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 443516920
- Off-chain at
- 2026-08-25T19:40:30.974Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- ErqpW5xtJr6qJaeQYbsyVidTAdynUYnbaTf7fT7PnmBr
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1118 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-08-25T19:40:30.860Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"c728ec71-a5d0-4641-9fd6-93840cd32777","new_score":22,"page_slug":"supra-oracle-bonzo-lend-attack-vector","prev_score":22,"reason":"The page's central and highest-risk claim -- that fault for the Bonzo Lend exploit lies with a flaw in Supra's oracle verifier rather than with Bonzo's lending contracts, and that this was a realized $9.05M exploit rather than a merely theoretical vector -- is well supported by Bonzo's own incident report and an independent Rekt News post-mortem, both fetched directly. Weaknesses cluster in the lower-stakes 'Entity Background' section, where the founding year, headquarters, and total funding figures conflict with other public sources and, in the funding case, the cited source itself does not contain the figure as retrieved; one internal inconsistency exists between 'pledged to return' and 'recovered' language describing Wallet B's $1M.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}