Skip to main content
Sign in
← avoid.net

Verify a decision

Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.

How verification works

  1. We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction.
  2. We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
  3. You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>

Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.

Sequence
#3
Score
00 (0)
Cluster
mainnet-beta
Slot
426522768
Off-chain at
2026-06-15T00:11:58.308Z
Anchored at
Block time

Independent verification

1. Database (off-chain)
C5GFSdkn7huu6UAkhvvsyw9rQu2QBrmia9WyWhbV8P8V
2. Recomputed (your browser)
computing…
3. On-chain (Solana memo)
fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1490 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-15T00:11:58.132Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"1c83c490-1790-40fa-8726-0a3dd0583379","new_score":0,"page_slug":"pt-digi-global-konsultan","prev_score":0,"reason":"The reviewer assessed 24 claims and found zero outright disputed findings, with a disputed_pct of 8.3%. All core allegations — the front company identity, pig-butchering methodology, $2.33 million fraud proceeds, 133 US-citizen victims, FBI collaboration, arrest date, and legal charges — are confirmed by multiple independent Tier 1 sources including ANTARA News, Tempo, and The Star. The five partially-supported findings are minor peripheral discrepancies: a one-suspect count difference (39 vs. 38) between wire services and Indonesian outlets attributable to different report dates (claim_findings[5], [14], [22]); a salary-floor variance of Rp5 million below the official police statement (claim_findings[16]); and a contextual-section characterization of a separate global operation as 'FBI-led' when Dubai Police co-led it (claim_findings[20]). The two unverifiable items are an editorial inference on a timeline end date and a 403-blocked citation whose underlying fact is corroborated elsewhere. No critical citations show link rot or staleness. Coverage gaps flagged are expansion suggestions, not accuracy failures.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}