Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review_approve · PT Digi Global Konsultan
- Sequence
- #3
- Score
- 0 → 0 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 426522768
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-15T00:11:58.308Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- C5GFSdkn7huu6UAkhvvsyw9rQu2QBrmia9WyWhbV8P8V
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1490 chars)
{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-06-15T00:11:58.132Z","decision":"review_approve","investigation_id":"1c83c490-1790-40fa-8726-0a3dd0583379","new_score":0,"page_slug":"pt-digi-global-konsultan","prev_score":0,"reason":"The reviewer assessed 24 claims and found zero outright disputed findings, with a disputed_pct of 8.3%. All core allegations — the front company identity, pig-butchering methodology, $2.33 million fraud proceeds, 133 US-citizen victims, FBI collaboration, arrest date, and legal charges — are confirmed by multiple independent Tier 1 sources including ANTARA News, Tempo, and The Star. The five partially-supported findings are minor peripheral discrepancies: a one-suspect count difference (39 vs. 38) between wire services and Indonesian outlets attributable to different report dates (claim_findings[5], [14], [22]); a salary-floor variance of Rp5 million below the official police statement (claim_findings[16]); and a contextual-section characterization of a separate global operation as 'FBI-led' when Dubai Police co-led it (claim_findings[20]). The two unverifiable items are an editorial inference on a timeline end date and a 403-blocked citation whose underlying fact is corroborated elsewhere. No critical citations show link rot or staleness. Coverage gaps flagged are expansion suggestions, not accuracy failures.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}