Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Rahul Ravinder Malhotra
- Sequence
- #6
- Score
- 67 → 67 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 464925798
- Off-chain at
- 2026-11-03T14:04:12.067Z
- Anchored at
- 2026-11-03T14:04:30.000Z
- Block time
- 2026-11-03T14:04:30.000Z
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- 5dc4aMM7wjwkgBCXi1ysKdWWY8EgXx4X85gr1iiSyH74
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (1253 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","artifact_identity":"53f1f63eb3fd6b928ffb40ab910428c1","blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-11-03T14:04:11.993Z","decision":"review","disputed_pct":0,"findings_hash":"Vaxm88gFEj8wNnGZMPKmym3fhzjUbtQrzJJrVSdmuSK","investigation_id":"c9aeffa8-3c0e-48d1-93f8-1cef120ab8fe","judge_def_hash":"750934ecb48272224909b7430fab271676d391380fbc821acbe7ee7e4cac2fa3","new_score":67,"page_content_hash":"8e0e40d9501e0959198aa8ed7b428f1cceca843d262095c8f443e42f836d84c8","page_slug":"rahul-ravinder-malhotra","prev_score":67,"reason":"The page is heavily hedged and honest about its thin sourcing. The firm-level SEBI fine and the SEBI ban with its SAT stay are supported by the cited news sources. The core appointment claim rests on a single aggregator page that returned 403, so it is unverified rather than refuted. No contradicting evidence was found, and the page does not tie the firm's enforcement history to the individual.","reviewer_def_hash":"3839668b232611e5b26db72079d64745f8e57e919b8a379e79b44ba4a52c845b","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":3,"sequence_num":6,"subject_status":"operating","subject_status_contradicts_page":false,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}