Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","decided_at":"2026-08-27T05:26:14.158Z","decision":"review_revise","investigation_id":"8a395680-2b49-4722-9fbc-bb87fe78dc08","new_score":56,"page_slug":"spiko-amundi-overnight-swap-fund-eur","prev_score":78,"reason":"An independent fact-check found that roughly 31% of this page's checkable claims (7 disputed, 3 unverifiable, out of 32) were either contradicted by primary sources or could not be confirmed, placing this page in the significant-issues tier. The most serious problem is that the page describes Spiko as co-managing the fund alongside Amundi, but the fund's own AMF regulatory registration certificate names a different company, Twenty First Capital, as the licensed fund manager -- an entity the page never mentions -- while Amundi's own press release and the Credit Agricole/CACEIS release describe Spiko's real role as transfer agent, tokenization platform, and broker, not co-manager (claim_findings[2], claim_findings[19]). The page also calls the fund a conventional 'money market fund' in three places, even though its own cited source and its own risk-disclosure section state the fund actually works differently from a standard money market fund -- a contradiction with both an outside source and the page itself (claim_findings[0]). Additional internal inconsistencies were found, including conflicting counts of blockchain networks (five vs. seven) and conflicting asset-value figures ($1.2 billion vs $1.6 billion) from different trackers for the same period, presented without explanation (claim_findings[13], [22]). Two disputed timeline dates use a first-of-the-month placeholder where sourcing shows a specific, different day. Three additional figures could not be re-checked at all because an archived snapshot of the original source could not be reached by the reviewer's tools; these are marked unconfirmed rather than proven wrong, and current live figures are consistent with ordinary growth of the fund. No allegations of fraud, misconduct, or regulatory action were found against Spiko, Amundi, or CACEIS. Because the core problem is a misdescription of which regulated company actually manages the fund plus an unresolved self-contradiction in how the fund is classified, the page is flagged for revision and placed under investigation rather than approved or delisted.","score_delta":-22,"sequence_num":3,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}