Verify a decision
Every moderation decision on AVOID.NET is anchored to the Solana blockchain. You don't have to trust us — you can verify cryptographically that we committed to a verdict at a specific moment and have not rewritten it.
How verification works
- We commit. When a moderator accepts/rejects a submission, we serialize the decision into deterministic UTF-8 bytes (
payload_canonical_string), hash it with SHA-256, encode the digest as base58, and write it to Solana inside an SPL Memo v2 transaction. - We store the bytes. The exact bytes we hashed are stored alongside the decision in our database. Anyone can read them and recompute the hash in any language.
- You compare three values. Database hash, your independently-recomputed hash, and the hash inside the on-chain memo. If all three match, the decision is authentic and timestamped.
The on-chain memo format is
AVOID.NET|v1|h:<b58-sha256>|d:<id>|t:<iso>Find a signature on any investigation page's decision log, or run python -m src.verify_decision --signature <sig> for a CLI check.
Decision
review · Balancer V2
- Sequence
- #2
- Score
- 18 → 18 (0)
- Cluster
- mainnet-beta
- Slot
- 426514848
- Off-chain at
- 2026-06-14T23:16:17.742Z
- Anchored at
- —
- Block time
- —
Independent verification
- 1. Database (off-chain)
- HTFnhGNKS9iFpvvKnzhDQSmPKDANGu1TfaYLpp98zSsH
- 2. Recomputed (your browser)
- computing…
- 3. On-chain (Solana memo)
- fetching…
Canonical bytes hashed (2028 chars)
{"actor":"reviewer","decided_at":"2026-06-14T23:16:17.689Z","decision":"review","investigation_id":"9c5049cc-896e-45f8-a737-0da7edafe4df","new_score":18,"page_slug":"balancer-v2","prev_score":18,"reason":"Blue-chip calibration review (Prompt A). Verdict: over-penalized. Page content is treated as accurate; the trust_score band is miscalibrated. Balancer V2 is a verifiably legitimate DeFi automated market maker launched in 2021, audited by four major security firms across 11 engagements, and which held peak TVL of approximately $3.5 billion. The CRITICAL score of 18 is severely miscalibrated: every incident driving the score — including the $128M November 2025 exploit — was perpetrated by external attackers exploiting technical smart contract vulnerabilities, not by Balancer's own fraud or deliberate misconduct. The page's own timeline and summary contradict the CRITICAL band by noting proactive security measures (bug bounties, Certora accelerator, successful liquidity rescue in 2023) and by describing Balancer as a legitimate AMM. The March 2026 dissolution of Balancer Labs is a post-exploit corporate restructuring, not a rug pull: the protocol continues operating with ~$24M TVL and daily fee generation as confirmed by DefiLlama. No regulatory enforcement actions exist against the entity. Under the corrected band semantics — CRITICAL reserved for evidence of fraud/scam — this entity belongs in WARNING (20-49), reflecting that it is a legitimate operator with a severe, unresolved security track record that caused major user losses and led to corporate restructuring, but without any fraud, Ponzi, or exit-scam mechanics. A score of 32 reflects the seriousness of cumulative exploit losses (~$130M+) and the ongoing uncertainty around post-restructuring protocol viability, while correctly distinguishing between being a hack victim and being a fraudulent actor.","score_delta":0,"sequence_num":2,"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}