Verify a decision

{"actor":"judge","artifact_identity":"76defe12c84df40d21590379ceee2a01","band_override":{"actual_delta":-30,"actual_verdict":"review_revise","disputed_pct":0.6364,"expected_delta_range":[-50,-30],"expected_verdict":"review_deny","rationale":"The core incident (March 28, 2026, about $254,000, pool mispricing on Solana) is confirmed (claim_findings[0]). Of 11 scorable claims (one DeFiLlama claim was blocked and excluded), 2 were disputed and 5 could not be found in any source, about 64%. The disputed items include a 'could have been caught in audit' quote that does not appear on the cited page (claim_findings[1], [2]). The unsupported items include a ZachXBT flag stated flatly in the summary and timeline (claim_findings[5], [6]), mixer laundering, and a market-share figure that Helius attributes to a different protocol (claim_findings[9]). The page also says there was no team response while the source reports the program was halted (omission_findings[0]). The percentage alone falls in the deny band, but the verdict is revise rather than deny because the reviewer's confidence was only 0.55, the central exploit claim holds, and the unsupported claims were mostly not found rather than contradicted."},"blocked_count":1,"decided_at":"2026-10-27T19:21:38.679Z","decision":"review_revise","delist_requested":false,"disputed_pct":0.6364,"investigation_id":"688e79fa-eb82-48bc-936a-f1fca1c23495","judge_def_hash":"8800307026131ea9d5da939d32b9a1f1884b2b84a5de33c8e87931d36f38d0f8","new_score":49,"page_slug":"goonfi","prev_score":49,"reason":"The core incident (March 28, 2026, about $254,000, pool mispricing on Solana) is confirmed (claim_findings[0]). Of 11 scorable claims (one DeFiLlama claim was blocked and excluded), 2 were disputed and 5 could not be found in any source, about 64%. The disputed items include a 'could have been caught in audit' quote that does not appear on the cited page (claim_findings[1], [2]). The unsupported items include a ZachXBT flag stated flatly in the summary and timeline (claim_findings[5], [6]), mixer laundering, and a market-share figure that Helius attributes to a different protocol (claim_findings[9]). The page also says there was no team response while the source reports the program was halted (omission_findings[0]). The percentage alone falls in the deny band, but the verdict is revise rather than deny because the reviewer's confidence was only 0.55, the central exploit claim holds, and the unsupported claims were mostly not found rather than contradicted.","reviewer_def_hash":"bc11388ce4bc4deea1b064fea362663ae06e3f4f687f99604769044d6ffba770","score_delta":0,"scored_claims":11,"sequence_num":4,"severity_override":{"applied":false,"band":null,"from_band":"deny","reason":"The material omission (source reports the program was reportedly halted, page says no team response) is already reflected in the unsupported-claim count, which puts the page in the harshest percentage band. It does not add a separate reason to change the verdict. The subject's current operating status is unknown and does not contradict the page."},"submission_content_hash":null,"submission_id":null,"submission_kind":null,"submission_valence":null,"v":1}