Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← Venus Core Poolreviewed 2026-11-02 · 12 claims checked

Fact-check findings

What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Venus Core Pool against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.

Read this first

These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.

“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.

Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.

disputed

1 claim

The reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. This is a lead, not a ruling that the claim is false.

  1. #1[disputed][awaiting moderator]in section: 2022 Terra/LUNA Collapse — $14 Million Bad Debt
    “During the collapse of the Terra/LUNA ecosystem in May 2022, Venus Protocol absorbed approximately $14 million in bad debt.”
    reviewerTerra/LUNA collapse caused approximately $14 million in bad debt on VenusA cited source gives $11.2M. The page's $14-15M figure was not found in the source I fetched. The Messari report was not checked.
    Proposed correction (not yet applied)
    During the collapse of the Terra/LUNA ecosystem in May 2022, Venus Protocol absorbed over $11.2 million in bad debt.

unverifiable

3 claims

No source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.

  1. #3[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: March 2026 Donation Attack — Dismissed Audit Finding Exploited
    “This massively increased borrowing power, allowing the attacker to borrow roughly $14.9 million in BTCB, CAKE, USDC, and other assets.”
    reviewerAttacker borrowed roughly $14.9 million and extracted ~$3.7MNo fetched source gives $14.9M; The Block and Protos give figures of $5.07M and $9.92M. Rekt and others were not checked, so I could not confirm or refute.
  2. #6[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: September 2025 Core Pool Exploit ($27 Million)
    “The protocol reported recovering $13.5 million through this forced liquidation.”
    reviewerVenus recovered $13.5M via lightning vote with 100% supportThe cited CoinDesk piece does not contain the $13.5M figure or the lightning vote detail. The other three cited sources were not fetched.
  3. #12[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in the cited sources
    “https://coincentral.com/venus-protocol-guide/”
    reviewerCoincentral archive does not match the cited URLThe stored archive_url points to an unrelated page (blockfi-vs-crypto-com), and the messari.io entry's archive points to blockworks. I did not fetch the original. Flagged for the judge.

partially supported

5 claims

The cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.

  1. #2[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: March 2026 Donation Attack — Dismissed Audit Finding Exploited
    “THE's price was pushed from approximately $0.26 to nearly $4 through recursive DEX purchases before collapsing.”
    reviewerTHE price pushed from ~$0.26 to nearly $4Sources differ (spot ~$5 vs oracle ~$0.50). The page's 'nearly $4' matches neither exactly. Low-stakes but imprecise.
  2. #7[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: September 2025 Core Pool Exploit ($27 Million)
    “Venus confirmed full restoration of services on September 3, 2025.”
    reviewerServices restored September 3, 2025Resumption happened on Sept 2 UTC with confirmation on Sept 3. The page and timeline's Sept 3 date for restoration is slightly off.
  3. #8[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Governance and Decentralization Concerns
    “Venus Protocol has accumulated over $112 million in cumulative losses across at least five separate incidents since 2021”
    reviewerOver $100M+ cumulative losses across at least five incidents (page says $112M)The $112M is the page's own sum and is not stated by a source. The source says over $100M in at least four incidents. It also counts bad debt, which differs from the $27M phishing loss that was largely recovered.
  4. #10[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: March 2026 Donation Attack — Dismissed Audit Finding Exploited
    “had already resulted in approximately $717,000 in bad debt.”
    reviewerZKSync Feb 2025 exploit ~$717,000 bad debtConsistent with 'over $700k'; exact figure unconfirmed.
  5. #11[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
    “Alleged attacker begins nine-month accumulation of THE (Thena) tokens on Venus, funded via ~7,400 ETH from Tornado Cash; community members allegedly raise concerns; Venus declines to act”
    reviewerTimeline says attacker began nine-month accumulation in June 2025 and Venus 'declines to act' after community concernsNine months before March 2026 gives roughly June 2025, which is an inference. The community-warning allegation rests on a dev.to post and is hedged. The entry has no source.

confirmed

3 claims

The cited evidence supports the claim as written.

  1. #4[confirmed][no action needed]in section: March 2026 Donation Attack — Dismissed Audit Finding Exploited
    “The Core Pool was left with $2.15 million in bad debt following 8,048 cascading liquidations.”
    reviewerAttacker accumulated ~84% of THE supply cap and exchange rate inflated 3.81x; 8,048 liquidations; ~7,400 ETH from Tornado Cash; $2.15M bad debt of CAKE and THECore quantitative claims match two independent sources.
  2. #5[confirmed][no action needed]in section: March 2026 Donation Attack — Dismissed Audit Finding Exploited
    “The attacker ultimately suffered a net loss of approximately $4.7 million due to the price collapse.”
    reviewerAttacker net loss of ~$4.7M after nine months of planningMatches Protos.
  3. #9[confirmed][no action needed]in section: 2021 XVS Oracle Manipulation — $95 Million Bad Debt
    “In May 2021, Venus Protocol's Core Pool incurred over $95 million in bad debt following an oracle manipulation attack targeting its own governance token, XVS.”
    reviewer2021 XVS manipulation left over $95M bad debt; ~2,000 BTC and 5,700 ETH borrowedMatches ChainCatcher.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.