Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← Vcex.io (As Sure Technology Co., Ltd.)reviewed 2026-11-03 · 4 claims checked

Fact-check findings

What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Vcex.io (As Sure Technology Co., Ltd.) against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.

Read this first

These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.

“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.

Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.

unverifiable 1partially supported 1confirmed 20 corrections pending · 0 applied

unverifiable

1 claim

No source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.

  1. #4[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: SEC Thailand criminal complaint
    “The complaint cites Section 26 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018), with penalty provisions under Section 66 together with Section 83 of the Criminal Code.”
    reviewerSection 26 of the Emergency Decree with penalty under Section 66 and Section 83 of the Criminal Code.Statutory section numbers could not be read in an accessible source.

partially supported

1 claim

The cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.

  1. #1[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in the summary
    “The SEC filed a criminal complaint on 7 October 2026 and arranged for public access to the platform to be blocked from 7 November 2026.”
    reviewerSEC filed a criminal complaint on 7 October 2026 and arranged for public access to be blocked from 7 November 2026.Dates confirmed. The SEC requested the block via MDES; 'arranged' implies it was ordered, which the source does not show. Minor wording issue.

confirmed

2 claims

The cited evidence supports the claim as written.

  1. #2[confirmed][no action needed]in section: SEC Thailand criminal complaint
    “The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of Thailand filed a criminal complaint with the Economic Crime Suppression Division against As Sure Technology Co., Ltd. and four related individuals, naming the company and a total of five parties.”
    reviewerSEC complaint against As Sure Technology and four related persons for operating Vcex.io as an unlicensed exchange.Matches the Digital Policy Alert page and the search summary of the Mitihoon report.
  2. #3[confirmed][no action needed]in section: SEC Thailand criminal complaint
    “between 24 December 2021 and 2 September 2022”
    reviewerAlleged conduct period 24 Dec 2021 to 2 Sep 2022.The period is consistent with the reporting of the SEC announcement.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.