← Unibotreviewed 2026-09-07 · 22 claims checked
Fact-check findings
What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Unibot against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.
Read this first
These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.
“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.
Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.
unverifiable
1 claimNo source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.
- #16[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Tokenomics and Revenue Sharing
“this migration was approved by a holder vote in the project's Telegram channel (reported as 81% in favor), rather than through a formal on-chain DAO governance mechanism.”
reviewerThe V1-to-V2 token migration was approved by a Telegram holder vote, reported as 81% in favor.The migration event itself (holder vote in Telegram, not formal on-chain governance) is corroborated, but the specific 81% approval figure could not be independently verified.
stale
1 claimThe claim was accurate when written but events since have overtaken it.
- #15[stale][awaiting moderator]in section: Tokenomics and Revenue Sharing
“Each buy and sell transaction on the UNIBOT token incurs a 4% fee, split as follows: 2% to token holders, 1% to the UNIBOT liquidity pool, and 1% to the team and operating expenses.”
reviewerEach buy/sell transaction on UNIBOT currently incurs a 4% fee split 2%/1%/1% among holders, LP, and team.The 4% split appears to describe a legacy (pre-V2-migration) fee structure that the project's own current documentation no longer supports; presented in the present tense ('incurs'), this misstates the current tokenomics.Proposed correction (not yet applied)As of the project's current official documentation, the UNIBOT token carries a 0% buy/sell tax on the token itself; token holders instead earn a share of separate bot trading fees, reported in official documentation as 40% of bot transaction fees distributed to holders.
partially supported
2 claimsThe cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.
- #3[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Overview and Background
“As of August 2026, UNIBOT trades at approximately $0.70 with a market cap near $636,000, down sharply from its 2023 peak above $200.”
reviewerAs of August 2026, UNIBOT trades at approximately $0.70 with a market cap near $636,000.The general trend (steep decline from a >$200 peak to sub-$1) is well supported, but the specific paired price/market-cap figures do not reconcile against the page's own stated 1,000,000 circulating supply; likely a snapshot-timing artifact rather than fabrication. - #20[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Market Trajectory and Competitive Position
“The project has reportedly dropped to seventh place by lifetime volume among Telegram trading bots.”
reviewerUNIBOT has reportedly dropped to seventh place by lifetime volume among Telegram trading bots.The '7th place' figure is corroborated, but the page narrows the reference category to 'Telegram trading bots' specifically, which the ranking source consulted does not explicitly do.
confirmed
18 claimsThe cited evidence supports the claim as written.
- #1[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Overview and Background
“Unibot launched on the Ethereum mainnet on May 17, 2023 as a Telegram bot designed to facilitate fast token trading on Uniswap v2 and v3 without requiring users to connect an external wallet interface.”
reviewerUnibot launched on Ethereum mainnet on May 17, 2023 as a Telegram-based trading bot for Uniswap v2/v3.Multiple independent sources corroborate the launch date and description. - #2[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Overview and Background
“According to TokenInsight and price aggregator data, the two co-founders are identified only as 'Ayden,' described as a former Apple employee, and an unnamed partner from a Bay Area machine learning startup.”
reviewerCo-founders identified only as 'Ayden' (former Apple employee) and an unnamed partner from a Bay Area machine learning startup.Bio details corroborated by an independent source beyond the cited TokenInsight page, which blocked automated fetch (403) but is not evidence the page itself is dead. - #4[confirmed][no action needed]in section: October 2023 Router Exploit (Suffered Hack)
“The attacker drained approximately 355.5 ETH worth of tokens — estimates of the USD value range from $560,000 to $640,000 across sources — before routing the stolen funds through Uniswap and then Tornado Cash.”
reviewerThe October 31, 2023 exploit drained ~355.5 ETH ($560,000-$640,000), routed through Uniswap then Tornado Cash.The hedged dollar range accurately reflects genuine variance across contemporaneous reporting ($560K-$640K). - #5[confirmed][no action needed]in section: October 2023 Router Exploit (Suffered Hack)
“The root cause was a call injection vulnerability: function 0xb2bd16ab lacked input validation, allowing an attacker to inject malicious calldata and invoke transferFrom on any token that users had pre-approved to the Unibot router contract.”
reviewerRoot cause was a call-injection vulnerability in function 0xb2bd16ab lacking input validation, enabling unauthorized transferFrom calls.Technical description matches two independent security-research write-ups. - #6[confirmed][no action needed]in section: October 2023 Router Exploit (Suffered Hack)
“CertiK documented the same class of vulnerability affecting both Unibot and Maestro (a competing Telegram trading bot) within the same week, with a combined loss of approximately $1.1 million.”
reviewerCertiK documented the same vulnerability class hitting Unibot and Maestro within the same week, combined loss ~$1.1 million.Directly confirmed by the cited CertiK analysis. - #7[confirmed][no action needed]in section: October 2023 Router Exploit (Suffered Hack)
“The Unibot team paused the router, confirmed the exploit publicly within hours, and stated: 'Your keys and wallets are safe.'”
reviewerUnibot publicly stated: 'Your keys and wallets are safe.'Exact quote match against the cited primary source. - #8[confirmed][no action needed]in section: October 2023 Router Exploit (Suffered Hack)
“According to CryptotTimes and CryptoRank reporting, 86% of stolen tokens were reacquired at market value, and a full $370,000 refund was provided for Joe coin, a heavily impacted asset.”
reviewer86% of stolen tokens were reacquired at market value; a full $370,000 refund was provided for Joe coin.The direct CryptoTimes fetch was blocked by a bot-verification wall, but the figures are independently corroborated. Note the page misspells the outlet as 'CryptotTimes.' - #9[confirmed][no action needed]in section: October 2023 Router Exploit (Suffered Hack)
“The team also waived transaction fees for ten days and raised the revenue share rate from 2% to 3% for token holders.”
reviewerUnibot waived transaction fees for ten days and raised revenue share from 2% to 3% for token holders.Corroborated by secondary reporting of the same underlying announcement. - #10[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Custodial and Private Key Risks
“In August 2023, prior to the October hack, Unibot launched 'Unibot Cloud,' a service intended to move private key storage away from Telegram's platform and deliver keys via self-destructing messages.”
reviewerUnibot launched 'Unibot Cloud' in August 2023 to move private key storage off Telegram; CertiK raised concerns.Matches the timeline date (2023-08-09) exactly. - #11[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Custodial and Private Key Risks
“CertiK director of security operations Hugh Brooks stating: 'The information does not clarify whether a third-party provider is involved, which could be a potential risk factor, such as susceptibility to supply chain attacks.'”
reviewerCertiK's Hugh Brooks stated concerns about third-party provider risk and supply-chain attack susceptibility.Verbatim quote confirmed against the cited primary source. - #12[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Solana Partnership Termination (March 2024)
“the Solana group launched a product named 'evm_unibot' on the Blast network without prior authorization from Unibot, refused to undergo KYC, and failed to honor fee-sharing commitments.”
reviewerThe Solana group launched unauthorized 'evm_unibot' on Blast, refused KYC, and failed fee-sharing commitments.Consistent across CoinDesk, Blockchain.news and Fully Crypto reporting. - #13[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Solana Partnership Termination (March 2024)
“The announcement caused the UNIBOT token to decline approximately 33–45% within 24 hours.”
reviewerUNIBOT declined approximately 33-45% within 24 hours of the Solana termination announcement.The hedged range accurately reflects real variance in contemporaneous price-drop reporting. - #14[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Tokenomics and Revenue Sharing
“UNIBOT launched with a total supply of 1,000,000 tokens and a 0.1% daily burn rate.”
reviewerUNIBOT launched with a total supply of 1,000,000 tokens and a 0.1% daily burn rate.Accurate as a launch-time description; the daily burn no longer applies today (see separate finding on the current fee structure). - #17[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Team Anonymity and Transparency
“No regulatory action by the SEC, CFTC, or any equivalent body against Unibot or its founders has been identified in available sources.”
reviewerNo regulatory action by the SEC, CFTC, or equivalent body against Unibot or its founders has been identified.Absence-of-evidence claim; no contradicting record found in a dedicated search. - #18[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Market Trajectory and Competitive Position
“the UNIBOT token reached a peak above $200 before the October 2023 exploit caused a sharp decline to the $30–$45 range.”
reviewerUNIBOT peaked above $200 before the exploit, then fell sharply into the $30-$45 range.Both the peak and post-exploit range are corroborated by market data and contemporaneous reporting. - #19[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Market Trajectory and Competitive Position
“By 2024 the token had continued declining; it closed the year at approximately $6.42 (approximately -90% year-over-year). By 2025 it closed near $1.53 (-75% year-over-year).”
reviewerUNIBOT closed 2024 at approximately $6.42 (-90% YoY) and closed 2025 at approximately $1.53 (-75% YoY).Figures are within normal cross-aggregator variance (a few percent) of independently found data; directionally and materially accurate. - #21[confirmed][no action needed]in the timeline
“Unibot deployed a new version of its router smart contract.”
reviewerUnibot deployed a new router smart contract on October 28, 2023.Date and event are consistent with independent exploit analyses. - #22[confirmed][no action needed]in the timeline
“External attacker exploited a call injection vulnerability in Unibot's new router contract, stealing approximately 355.5 ETH ($560,000–$640,000) in user tokens. Stolen funds were subsequently routed through Tornado Cash. UNIBOT token price fell from approximately $57 to $32.”
reviewerOn October 31, 2023 an external attacker exploited a call injection vulnerability, stealing ~355.5 ETH ($560,000-$640,000); UNIBOT price fell from ~$57 to ~$32.Dollar range, ETH amount, Tornado Cash routing, and the specific price-drop figures are all independently corroborated.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.