Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← Tectonicreviewed 2026-11-04 · 5 claims checked

Fact-check findings

What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Tectonic against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.

Read this first

These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.

“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.

Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.

stale 2partially supported 2confirmed 12 corrections pending · 0 applied

stale

2 claims

The claim was accurate when written but events since have overtaken it.

  1. #1[stale][awaiting moderator]in section: TVL History and Market Performance
    “As of 2025–2026, Tectonic remains operational but with a substantially lower TVL relative to its 2022 peak.”
    reviewerTectonic remains operational as of 2025-2026Superseded by the August 2026 exploit and chain halt/rollback. The page was generated with a May 2026 research cutoff.
    Proposed correction (not yet applied)
    As of 2025–2026, Tectonic remained operational but with a substantially lower TVL relative to its 2022 peak, until an August 30, 2026 exploit led Cronos to halt and roll back its chain.
    citedinvezz.com/news/2023/11/15/cronos-cro-pr…tonic-tvl-rises/
  2. #2[stale][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
    “indicating the protocol remains active but with sparse public communications.”
    reviewerTeam post indicates the protocol remains activePresent-tense claim of activity is superseded by the August 2026 exploit.
    Proposed correction (not yet applied)
    indicating the protocol was active at that time but with sparse public communications.

partially supported

2 claims

The cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.

  1. #4[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: TONIC Token Economics and Inflation Risk
    “The TONIC token reached an all-time high of approximately $0.0000019 on February 8, 2022, shortly after the mainnet launch”
    reviewerTONIC ATH approximately $0.0000019 on Feb 8, 2022Page is internally inconsistent: the timeline dates the ATH 2021-12-23 and this section says 2022-02-08. CoinGecko shows a higher ATH value. Not resolved, so no correction proposed.
    citedwww.coingecko.com/en/coins/tectonic
  2. #5[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: TONIC Token Economics and Inflation Risk
    “approximately 247.73 trillion TONIC — roughly 49.5% of total supply — is in circulation”
    reviewerCirculating supply about 247.73 trillion, 49.5% of totalCirculating supply and market cap differ from current CoinGecko values; the figures are time-dependent and the page's may be dated.
    citedcoinmarketcap.com/currencies/tectonic/

confirmed

1 claim

The cited evidence supports the claim as written.

  1. #3[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Security Incidents and Vulnerabilities
    “a separate reentrancy vulnerability was disclosed in a public bug report dated March 22, 2024”
    reviewerReentrancy bug report dated March 22, 2024 on staking poolGist matches the page on date, address, figures and difficulty.
    citedgist.github.com/fatherGoose1/690fa2d8245…750b67a0fdeb34bc
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.