← Solanareviewed 2026-09-09 · 21 claims checked
Fact-check findings
What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Solana against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.
Read this first
These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.
“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.
Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.
disputed
1 claimThe reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. This is a lead, not a ruling that the claim is false.
- #20[disputed][awaiting moderator]in section: Recent Security Vulnerabilities
“One issue involved Solana's gossip system, the mechanism validators use to share certain network messages even when block production is disrupted. Per Anza, a missing verification step could have allowed an attacker to flood validators with invalid vote messages in a way that interfered with normal vote handling, potentially stalling consensus if done at scale.”
reviewerThe gossip-system vulnerability involved a missing verification step that could flood validators with invalid vote messages and stall consensusThe page's own cited source draws a clear distinction between two separate December 2025 vulnerabilities (gossip system vs. vote processing) and this sentence conflates them, attaching the vote-processing vulnerability's description to the gossip system.Proposed correction (not yet applied)One issue involved Solana's vote processing, which is central to how validators participate in consensus. Per Anza, a missing verification step could have allowed an attacker to flood validators with invalid vote messages in a way that interfered with normal vote handling, potentially stalling consensus if done at scale.
stale
3 claimsThe claim was accurate when written but events since have overtaken it.
- #4[stale][awaiting moderator]in section: Network Stability Issues
“It has been 262 days — over 37 weeks or more than 6,000 hours — since Solana last suffered a major outage.”
reviewerIt has been 262 days since Solana's last major outageThis was true on the article's publication date but is presented in the page as a current, undated fact even though the page elsewhere discusses events into 2026. The underlying streak (no major outage since Feb 6, 2024) still holds, but the frozen '262 days' figure is roughly 700+ days out of date.Proposed correction (not yet applied)As of September 2026, it has been more than two and a half years — over 130 weeks or more than 22,000 hours — since Solana last suffered a major outage. - #5[stale][awaiting moderator]in section: Network Stability Issues
“According to the network's own incident history tracker, the last major outage occurred on February 6 this year and lasted five hours.”
reviewerThe network's own incident tracker shows the last major outage occurred 'February 6 this year' and lasted five hoursThe underlying fact (Feb 6, 2024, five-hour outage) is accurate and matches the timeline entry, but 'this year' was copied from the 2024 source article without being anchored to a year, which now reads as if it refers to the current year.Proposed correction (not yet applied)According to the network's own incident history tracker, the last major outage occurred on February 6, 2024, and lasted five hours. - #15[stale][awaiting moderator]in section: Regulatory and Legal Issues
“In June 2023, the SEC sued Coinbase, alleging that Solana and twelve other currencies offered by the platform failed the Howey Test and qualified as securities.”
reviewerIn June 2023 the SEC sued Coinbase alleging SOL and 12 other tokens were unregistered securitiesThe 2023 filing itself is accurately described (13 tokens including SOL named, matching 'twelve other currencies'), but the section never mentions that the SEC dismissed this exact suit with prejudice in February 2025, which materially changes the current regulatory-risk picture the section is trying to convey.Proposed correction (not yet applied)In June 2023, the SEC sued Coinbase, alleging that Solana and twelve other currencies offered by the platform failed the Howey Test and qualified as securities; the SEC voluntarily dismissed this suit with prejudice in February 2025 after forming its Crypto Task Force, without any court finding that SOL is a security.
partially supported
4 claimsThe cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.
- #8[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Meme Coin Scam Epidemic
“According to CoinDesk, Solana-based rug pulls resulted in the loss of around $500 million in 2024 alone.”
reviewerCoinDesk reported Solana-based rug pulls caused around $500 million in losses in 2024The $500M loss figure is real and well-sourced, but the page's framing that it was specifically 'Solana-based' overstates what CoinDesk's underlying report says, which covers memecoin scams generally (heavily but not exclusively on Solana). - #10[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Meme Coin Scam Epidemic
“The meme coin contamination has made Solana toxic to compliance departments. How can an institution explain to regulators why they're operating on a network where 99% of activity is obvious securities fraud?”
reviewerInstitutions cannot explain operating on a network where 99% of activity is obvious securities fraudThe sentence is lifted from a low-credibility opinion essay and presented as a flat, unattributed rhetorical assertion rather than a sourced statistic; it should be attributed as commentary/opinion rather than read as an independent finding. - #17[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Regulatory and Legal Issues
“California resident Mark Young alleges key players in the Solana ecosystem misled investors and sold them unregistered securities. The plaintiff, Mark Young, filed the suit on July 1 against Solana Labs, Solana Foundation, Solana CEO Anatoly Yakovenko, crypto investment firm Multicoin Capital and its co-founder Kyle Samani, as well as trading platform FalconX.”
reviewerMark Young filed a class action on July 1 against Solana Labs, the Foundation, Yakovenko, Multicoin/Samani, and FalconXThe facts (names, filing date, defendants) are accurate, but the sentence gives no year and is placed directly after a paragraph about the June 2023 SEC suit, which invites readers to assume this happened in 2023; the underlying filing was actually July 1, 2022 (consistent with the page's own timeline entry). - #18[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Regulatory and Legal Issues
“As of May 2021, insiders held 48% of the SOL supply. The network is thus highly centralized.”
reviewerAs of May 2021, insiders held 48% of the SOL supply, making the network highly centralizedThe page states this as flat fact, but it is an allegation within an active, unresolved lawsuit (the case survived a motion to dismiss/compel arbitration in September 2024 and remains pending), not an adjudicated or independently confirmed statistic. It should be attributed to the lawsuit rather than stated as settled fact.
confirmed
13 claimsThe cited evidence supports the claim as written.
- #1[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Network Stability Issues
“Over the past five years, Solana has experienced seven separate outage incidents, five of which were caused by client bugs and two by the network's inability to handle floods of transaction spam.”
reviewerSolana has had seven separate outage incidents in five years, five caused by client bugs and two by transaction-spam floodsThe 7 total / 5 client-bug / 2 spam-flood breakdown matches the cited Helius article's own framing as echoed across independent indexations of the source. - #2[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Network Stability Issues
“On 14 September 2021, the Solana blockchain went offline after a surge of transactions caused the network to fork, and different validators had different views of the state of the network. The outage lasted a total of about 17 hours.”
reviewerThe 14 September 2021 outage lasted about 17 hours after a transaction surge forked the networkMatches both the Helius account and the corresponding timeline entry. - #3[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Network Stability Issues
“In October 2022, Solana experienced one of its most severe protocol-level failures, a consensus bug that brought the network to a standstill for over six hours. The issue stemmed from a validator producing multiple conflicting blocks, creating a fork that prevented the rest of the network from reaching agreement.”
reviewerOctober 2022 consensus bug caused a six-hour-plus network standstill from a validator producing conflicting blocksConsistent across two independent outage-history sources and the page's own timeline entry. - #6[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Meme Coin Scam Epidemic
“Solidus Labs reveals that 98.6% of tokens launched on Solana's Pump.fun and 93% of pools on Raydium exhibited signs of fraudulent activity.”
reviewerSolidus Labs found 98.6% of Pump.fun tokens and 93% of Raydium pools showed signs of fraudulent activityFigures match the underlying Solidus Labs report as reported by multiple outlets. - #7[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Meme Coin Scam Epidemic
“Researchers analyzed over 7 million tokens on Pump.fun between January 2024 and March 2025, finding that fewer than 100,000 maintained liquidity above $1,000.”
reviewerResearchers analyzed 7 million-plus Pump.fun tokens (Jan 2024-Mar 2025) and found fewer than 100,000 maintained liquidity above $1,000Figure is consistent across independent reporting on the Solidus Labs study. - #9[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Meme Coin Scam Epidemic
“Median losses per incident totaled $2,832, with one case exceeding $1.9 million.”
reviewerMedian losses per rug-pull incident totaled $2,832, with one case exceeding $1.9 millionMatches independent reporting on the same underlying study. - #11[confirmed][no action needed]in section: FTX Collapse Impact
“In November 2022, the price of SOL token dropped by 40 percent in one day following the bankruptcy of FTX, due to sell off from Alameda Research.”
reviewerSOL dropped 40% in one day in November 2022 following FTX's bankruptcy, driven by Alameda selloffDirect match to the cited Wikipedia source. - #12[confirmed][no action needed]in section: FTX Collapse Impact
“SOL tokens were Alameda's second-largest holding at the time and FTX held $982 million in SOL tokens.”
reviewerFTX held $982 million in SOL tokens, its second-largest Alameda holdingDirect match to the cited Wikipedia source. - #13[confirmed][no action needed]in section: FTX Collapse Impact
“By the end of 2022, Solana had lost more than $50 billion in market capitalization since the beginning of the year.”
reviewerBy end of 2022, Solana had lost more than $50 billion in market capitalization since the start of the yearConfirmed by an independent tier-1 source as well as the cited Wikipedia article. - #14[confirmed][no action needed]in section: FTX Collapse Impact
“Following the $477 million hack of FTX, there were worries that the private keys to Solana-based decentralized exchange Serum had been compromised.”
reviewerFollowing the $477 million FTX hack, Serum's private keys were feared compromised because FTX (not a DAO) controlled themBoth the hack dollar figure and the Serum key-compromise narrative are corroborated by independent reporting (CNBC, CoinDesk, Elliptic). - #16[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Regulatory and Legal Issues
“The price of SOL token dropped nearly 30% after this announcement from the SEC, This caused some exchanges to liquidate their holdings, including Robinhood which delisted SOL and other tokens named by the SEC.”
reviewerSOL dropped nearly 30% after the SEC announcement and Robinhood delisted SOL and other named tokensDirect match to the cited Wikipedia source. - #19[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Recent Security Vulnerabilities
“Two critical potential vulnerabilities were disclosed in December 2025 via GitHub security advisories, and Anza said the issues were patched in collaboration with Firedancer, Jito, and the Solana Foundation.”
reviewerTwo critical Solana vulnerabilities were disclosed in December 2025 via GitHub advisories and patched with Firedancer, Jito, and the Solana FoundationMatches the cited source. - #21[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Recent Security Vulnerabilities
“The amount of cryptocurrencies involved, as determined by blockchain data analysts, could make this one of the biggest hacks in crypto's history, the Bloomberg report added, noting that some of the stolen crypto was converted into Circle's USDC stablecoin.”
reviewerBloomberg reported the Drift Protocol hack could be one of the biggest hacks in crypto history, with some funds converted to USDCConfirmed by multiple independent tier-1/tier-2 sources beyond the cited PYMNTS piece.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.