← Shelbit Exchangereviewed 2026-10-16 · 33 claims checked
Fact-check findings
What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Shelbit Exchange against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.
Read this first
These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.
“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.
Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.
disputed
2 claimsThe reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. This is a lead, not a ruling that the claim is false.
- #16[disputed][awaiting moderator]in section: Binance Transaction Flows
“Some reports indicate that amounts reaching Binance after VARA's July 2026 enforcement action totaled at least $540 million when cumulative flows are considered.”
reviewerSome reports indicate amounts reaching Binance after VARA's July 2026 enforcement action totaled at least $540 millionThis sentence restates the same $540 million figure as the prior sentence but attributes it to a different VARA action (July 2026 Notice of Fines rather than the January 2025 cease-and-desist). No source supports a second, independent $540 million figure tied to July 2026; this reads as an internal duplication/contradiction that should be removed.Proposed correction (not yet applied)Binance's precise exposure to liability remains unresolved as of August 2026. - #30[disputed][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
“2026”
reviewerShelbit claims to have ceased operations, per a statement issued on August 1, 2026 (timeline entry dated '2026' / date_original 2026-01-01)This entry's date field is the bare year '2026' while its date_original is 2026-01-01 (January 2026, matching the claimed cessation month), yet its event text instead narrates an August 1, 2026 statement -- which is already covered by the separate timeline[6] entry dated 2026-08. The vague '2026' date field, combined with event text pointing to August, misplaces this entry relative to its own claimed subject (a January 2026 cessation) and duplicates timeline[6]. Setting the date field to 2026-01 aligns it with date_original and the claim being described.Proposed correction (not yet applied)2026-01
unverifiable
1 claimNo source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.
- #28[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Shelbit's Public Response
“Shelbit additionally stated that it had ceased operations in January 2026.”
reviewerShelbit stated it had ceased operations in January 2026Could not independently verify this specific detail of Shelbit's own statement. The page already appropriately treats the underlying claim as unconfirmed in its next sentence, which is good practice.
stale
3 claimsThe claim was accurate when written but events since have overtaken it.
- #6[stale][awaiting moderator]in the summary
“processed at least $4 billion in digital assets since May 2024”
reviewerShelbit processed at least $4 billion in digital assets since May 2024The $4 billion figure was accurate for the Reuters report that first broke the story, but TRM Labs' own subsequent analysis (named elsewhere on the page as a source) found $6.3 billion in the same period, superseding the earlier estimate. Presenting $4 billion as the current total in the summary is stale.Proposed correction (not yet applied)processed at least $6.3 billion in digital assets since May 2024 - #7[stale][awaiting moderator]in section: Scale of Alleged Sanctions Evasion
“determined that Shelbit processed at least $4 billion in digital assets since becoming active in May 2024”
reviewerBlockchain investigators including TRM Labs determined Shelbit processed at least $4 billion since becoming active in May 2024The sentence specifically names TRM Labs as a source for the $4 billion figure, but TRM's own published figure for the identical period is $6.3 billion. This both misattributes the figure and is now a stale number.Proposed correction (not yet applied)determined that Shelbit processed at least $6.3 billion in digital assets since becoming active in May 2024 - #8[stale][awaiting moderator]in section: Illegal Gambling Network
“with the full $4 billion figure encompassing all flows through the exchange including Iranian state-linked and IRGC activity”
reviewerThe $4 billion figure encompasses all flows through the exchange including Iranian state-linked and IRGC activitySame underlying figure problem repeated a third time on the page.Proposed correction (not yet applied)with the full $6.3 billion figure (per TRM Labs' later analysis) encompassing all flows through the exchange including Iranian state-linked and IRGC activity
partially supported
4 claimsThe cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.
- #15[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Binance Transaction Flows
“Approximately $540 million of that amount is alleged to have reached Binance wallets after Dubai's VARA first issued a cease-and-desist against Shelbit in January 2025, indicating that flows continued through major exchanges even after regulatory warnings.”
reviewerApproximately $540 million reached Binance after VARA's January 2025 cease-and-desistThe $540 million figure and its January 2025 dating is correctly sourced, but the page presents it as settled while its own cited reporting shows Binance specifically disputing that number, not just denying wrongdoing generally. - #20[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Dubai VARA Enforcement Actions
“This marked the second enforcement action against the same entity within eighteen months.”
reviewerThis marked the second enforcement action against the same entity within eighteen monthsThe two-enforcement-actions characterization is reasonable but the 'within eighteen months' framing is the page's own calculation and is not quite accurate; the gap is closer to 18.7 months. - #23[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Operator and Corporate Structure
“Kayvanpour, along with Iranian social media influencers Sasha Sobhani and Pooyan Mokhtari — public faces of the gambling network who promoted lavish lifestyles online — were each convicted in absentia in Iran in 2023 on illegal gambling charges.”
reviewerKayvanpour, Sobhani, and Mokhtari were convicted in absentia in Iran in 2023 on illegal gambling chargesThe underlying fact is corroborated elsewhere, but the specific source cited for this claim (iranintl.com) does not contain it -- a citation-accuracy problem rather than a factual one. - #24[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
“Siavash Kayvanpour, Sasha Sobhani, and Pooyan Mokhtari convicted in absentia in Iran on illegal gambling charges.”
reviewerSiavash Kayvanpour, Sasha Sobhani, and Pooyan Mokhtari convicted in absentia in Iran on illegal gambling charges (timeline entry)Same citation mismatch as the corresponding section-4 claim; the fact is true per other reporting but mis-sourced in the timeline entry too.
confirmed
23 claimsThe cited evidence supports the claim as written.
- #1[confirmed][no action needed]in section: OFAC Sanctions Designation
“On August 7, 2026, the U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned Shelbit Exchange, its operator Siavash Kayvanpour, and a network of affiliated corporate entities under Executive Order 13224 (as amended) and Executive Order 13902, which relate to Iran-linked financial activity and support for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).”
reviewerOFAC designated Shelbit Exchange, Kayvanpour, and affiliated entities on August 7, 2026 under EO 13224 and EO 13902Directly confirmed against the primary Treasury press release. - #2[confirmed][no action needed]in section: OFAC Sanctions Designation
“The Treasury stated that IRGC-linked digital currency addresses sent the equivalent of over $1 million in digital assets to Shelbit Exchange addresses, while more than $2 million was transferred from Shelbit addresses to IRGC wallets.”
reviewerIRGC-linked wallets sent over $1 million to Shelbit and more than $2 million was sent back from Shelbit to IRGC walletsConfirmed verbatim against Treasury press release. - #3[confirmed][no action needed]in section: OFAC Sanctions Designation
“Wallets controlled by Kayvanpour himself allegedly sent over $2 million to Nobitex, Iran's largest cryptocurrency exchange, which was separately sanctioned by the U.S. in 2026.”
reviewerKayvanpour-controlled wallets sent over $2 million to Nobitex, which was separately sanctioned by the U.S. in 2026Both the transfer figure and the 2026 Nobitex sanctions timing check out. - #4[confirmed][no action needed]in section: OFAC Sanctions Designation
“Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated: 'The Iranian regime's reliance on digital assets and shadow banking networks is further evidence that Economic Fury is working.'”
reviewerTreasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated that the Iranian regime's reliance on digital assets and shadow banking is evidence 'Economic Fury' is workingQuote verified character-for-character against the primary source. - #5[confirmed][no action needed]in section: OFAC Sanctions Designation
“The U.S. State Department's Rewards for Justice program offered up to $15 million for information disrupting IRGC financial mechanisms, a program referenced in connection with the Shelbit action.”
reviewerRewards for Justice offered up to $15 million for information disrupting IRGC financial mechanismsConfirmed. - #9[confirmed][no action needed]in the timeline
“Reuters publishes investigation linking Shelbit to a $4 billion Iranian sanctions-evasion network involving 2,000+ gambling sites, Iran's central bank, IRGC-linked wallets, and $676 million in flows traced to Binance.”
reviewerReuters' July 31, 2026 investigation reported Shelbit linked to a $4 billion sanctions-evasion networkThis timeline entry describes what Reuters reported on that date, which is accurate as a historical record, even though TRM's later report revised the total upward. - #10[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Scale of Alleged Sanctions Evasion
“TRM Labs researcher John Wojcik described the gambling component as 'by far the biggest Iranian illegal gambling network ever discovered and one of the biggest in the world.'”
reviewerTRM Labs researcher John Wojcik described the gambling network as 'by far the biggest Iranian illegal gambling network ever discovered and one of the biggest in the world'Confirmed verbatim. - #11[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Scale of Alleged Sanctions Evasion
“Independent blockchain researcher Rich Sanders stated: 'It's an IRGC operation, and that's plain as day.'”
reviewerIndependent blockchain researcher Rich Sanders stated: 'It's an IRGC operation, and that's plain as day.'Confirmed verbatim. - #12[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Scale of Alleged Sanctions Evasion
“At least $125 million in flows was traced by investigators to addresses connected to Iran's central bank.”
reviewerAt least $125 million in flows was traced to addresses connected to Iran's central bankConfirmed. - #13[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Scale of Alleged Sanctions Evasion
“At least $20 million was linked to a suspected Iranian bitcoin mining operation.”
reviewerAt least $20 million was linked to a suspected Iranian bitcoin mining operationConfirmed. - #14[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Binance Transaction Flows
“Reuters and affiliated blockchain researchers traced at least $676 million from Shelbit-linked addresses to Binance wallets between May 2024 and the time of reporting.”
reviewerAt least $676 million was traced from Shelbit-linked addresses to Binance wallets between May 2024 and the time of reportingConfirmed; URL also verified live (blocks direct scraping but renders via browser fetch). - #17[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Binance Transaction Flows
“Binance stated that Shelbit had never held an account on its platform and that it was not a sanctioned entity at the time of the transactions. Binance also stated that once investigators surfaced the connections, it froze relevant accounts.”
reviewerBinance stated Shelbit never held an account on its platform and was not a sanctioned entity at the time of the transactions; Binance froze accounts once investigators surfaced the connectionsConfirmed. - #18[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Dubai VARA Enforcement Actions
“Dubai's Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) issued a formal cease-and-desist notice against Shelbit General Trading L.L.C. on January 2, 2025, citing unlicensed operation of virtual asset services in Dubai.”
reviewerVARA issued a formal cease-and-desist notice against Shelbit General Trading L.L.C. on January 2, 2025 for unlicensed operationConfirmed exact date and characterization. - #19[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Dubai VARA Enforcement Actions
“On July 24, 2026, VARA published a Notice of Fines against Shelbit General Trading L.L.C., citing violations of Federal Decree-Law No. (10) of 2025 (Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Terrorism Financing), Cabinet Resolution No. (111) of 2022 (Virtual Assets Regulation), Dubai Law No. (4) of 2022 (Virtual Assets Regulation), and VARA Regulations and Rulebooks.”
reviewerOn July 24, 2026 VARA published a Notice of Fines citing specific named laws and violations (unlicensed operation, KYC failures, unauthorized marketing)Confirmed verbatim against the primary regulatory notice summary. - #21[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Operator and Corporate Structure
“Siavash Kayvanpour, an Iranian-born individual who holds additional citizenship from Dominica and Afghanistan, and who resided in the United Arab Emirates, was personally designated by OFAC on August 7, 2026.”
reviewerKayvanpour holds additional citizenship from Dominica and Afghanistan and resided in the UAEConfirmed. - #22[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Operator and Corporate Structure
“Additional designated entities include: Shelbit Technologies Ltd Spolka Z Ograniczona Odpowiedzialnoscia W Likwidacji (Poland-based), Crypto Home DMCC (UAE-based), and NFT Home DMCC (UAE-based), all with Kayvanpour as the controlling party.”
reviewerNamed affiliated corporate entities: SHPS Shelbit (Georgia), Shelbit General Trading LLC (UAE), Shelbit Technologies Ltd (Poland), Crypto Home DMCC (UAE), NFT Home DMCC (UAE), all controlled by KayvanpourConfirmed. - #25[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Operator and Corporate Structure
“Sobhani denied involvement in money laundering, sanctions evasion, or terrorism financing. Mokhtari denied links to the IRGC and stated he was unfamiliar with Shelbit.”
reviewerSobhani denied involvement in money laundering, sanctions evasion, or terrorism financing; Mokhtari denied links to the IRGC and said he was unfamiliar with ShelbitConfirmed. - #26[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Illegal Gambling Network
“Reuters, in its July 31, 2026 investigation, documented that Shelbit processed at least $250 million attributable directly to the illegal gambling network, with the full $4 billion figure encompassing all flows through the exchange including Iranian state-linked and IRGC activity.”
reviewerShelbit processed at least $250 million directly attributable to the illegal gambling network, within the larger $4 billion figureThe $250 million figure is confirmed; the embedded $4 billion reference carries the same staleness issue flagged under defect_group shelbit-4b-vs-6.3b-total-volume but is not duplicated again here. - #27[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Shelbit's Public Response
“In the statement, the company 'categorically rejects any suggestion that the company knowingly participated in money laundering, terrorist financing, illegal gambling activity, sanctions evasion, or activity on behalf of any sanctioned, military, or governmental organisation.'”
reviewerFollowing the Reuters investigation, Shelbit reactivated its website and issued a statement on August 1, 2026 categorically rejecting wrongdoingConfirmed via independent corroborating reporting of the same statement; primary U.S. News URL could not be directly loaded during this review (server error, not necessarily link rot). - #29[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Shelbit's Public Response
“No independent verification of a January 2026 cessation of operations has been confirmed; the Reuters investigation and OFAC designation both reference activity continuing through at least the time of VARA's July 24, 2026 enforcement action, and $540 million in traced Binance flows is alleged to have occurred after the January 2025 cease-and-desist order.”
reviewerNo independent verification of a January 2026 cessation has been confirmed; activity continued through at least VARA's July 24, 2026 action, with $540M in Binance flows after the January 2025 cease-and-desistThis hedge is well-supported and appropriately skeptical. - #31[confirmed][no action needed]in the timeline
“Shelbit reactivates its website and issues a public statement categorically denying knowing participation in money laundering, terrorist financing, gambling, sanctions evasion, or activity on behalf of any sanctioned, military, or governmental organization.”
reviewerShelbit reactivates its website and issues a public statement denying wrongdoing (August 2026)Confirmed, and correctly dated to August 2026, which is the real conflict point with timeline[3]. - #32[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Broader Iran Crypto Crackdown Context
“In the same August 7, 2026 action, OFAC also sanctioned Iran-based Aban Tether, which had processed millions in transactions for sanctioned Iranian exchanges including Nobitex, Wallex, Bitpin, and Ramzinex.”
reviewerOFAC also sanctioned Aban Tether in the same August 7, 2026 action, which processed transactions for Nobitex, Wallex, Bitpin, and RamzinexConfirmed. - #33[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Broader Iran Crypto Crackdown Context
“Nobitex, Iran's largest cryptocurrency exchange, had itself been sanctioned earlier in 2026.”
reviewerNobitex had itself been sanctioned earlier in 2026Confirmed.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.