← Serenity Shieldreviewed 2026-11-02 · 9 claims checked
Fact-check findings
What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Serenity Shield against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.
Read this first
These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.
“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.
Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.
unverifiable
4 claimsNo source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.
- #2[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: February 2024 Security Breach
“On February 27, 2024, at approximately 9:11 AM UTC, an unauthorized party gained access to a MetaMask hot wallet”
reviewerExact time of the hack was about 9:11 AM UTCThe 9:11 AM UTC time is not in the readable cited source. Note also the page puts the holder snapshot at 2:26 PM UTC and calls it 'the time of the exploit', which conflicts with 9:11 AM. - #3[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Team Response and Token Relaunch
“A snapshot of holder balances was taken at 2:26 PM UTC on February 27, 2024 — the time of the exploit — and the new tokens were to be distributed via airdrop on a 1:1 basis to approximately 7,400 holders.”
reviewerSnapshot taken at 2:26 PM UTC was the time of the exploit (conflicts with 9:11 AM UTC elsewhere)Cited Altcoin Buzz URL no longer shows the article. The 2:26 PM versus 9:11 AM inconsistency should be resolved from the official blog. - #6[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in the summary
“On-chain investigator ZachXBT linked the attacker to a serial hacker responsible for multiple private-key compromise incidents across at least six other protocols in late 2023 and early 2024.”
reviewerFake-recruiter malware method; summary says at least six other protocolsThe body names only four protocols (OKX DEX, Concentric, SpaceCatch, Reach) plus unnamed 'several additional'. 'At least six' was not verified. - #8[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Token Price Impact
“As of available data through early 2026, SERSH trades well below its pre-hack price, with the post-relaunch token reaching a maximum of approximately $0.17 in 2025 before declining further.”
reviewerToken has never recovered; post-relaunch token peaked near $0.17 in 2025Price data pages were not fetched; the 2025 peak was not checked. Note a second token migration in 2026 (see omissions).
link rot
1 claimA cited source no longer resolves or no longer says what the page attributes to it.
- #4[link rot][awaiting moderator]in section: Team Response and Token Relaunch
“https://www.altcoinbuzz.io/cryptocurrency-news/serenity-shield-token-reissue-coming-soon/”
reviewerCited Altcoin Buzz reissue article is the source for the team response and March 2024 relaunch timeline entriesThe URL no longer supports the claims. No replacement found, so only removal is proposed (also used by timeline[5] and timeline[8]).
partially supported
2 claimsThe cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.
- #5[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: ZachXBT On-Chain Investigation
“the wallet addresses involved in the Serenity Shield hack share on-chain connections with the December 2023 OKX DEX exploit (approximately $2.7 million) and the January 2024 Concentric Finance hack (approximately $1.8 million)”
reviewerZachXBT linked the attacker to the December 2023 OKX DEX exploit and the January 2024 Concentric Finance hackThe linkage is confirmed; the $2.7M and $1.8M figures could not be checked. - #7[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in the summary
“On February 27, 2024, a team MetaMask wallet was compromised and 6.9 million SERSH tokens valued at approximately $5.6 million were stolen, causing the token price to collapse by over 95% within 24 hours.”
reviewerPrice collapse of over 95% within 24 hours; pre-hack price roughly $0.82A collapse of 95% or more is well supported. The $5.6M is a notional figure (only about $586K realized), and the $0.82 price conflicts with a CoinGecko-based $0.565 in one report. The summary does not say the value was nominal.
confirmed
2 claimsThe cited evidence supports the claim as written.
- #1[confirmed][no action needed]in section: February 2024 Security Breach
“The attacker was only able to liquidate approximately $586,000 worth of tokens before selling pressure collapsed the price.”
reviewerAttacker liquidated only about $586,000 of the stolen tokensMatches the cited source. - #9[confirmed][no action needed]in the timeline
“Serenity Shield team sends on-chain message to hacker offering 15% bounty and legal immunity in exchange for return of stolen funds.”
reviewerTeam offered 15% bounty and legal immunity via on-chain messageOffer confirmed. The timeline date of 2024-02-28 is unverified; the source article is dated 2024-02-27.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.