← Rubicreviewed 2026-11-02 · 10 claims checked
Fact-check findings
What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Rubic against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.
Read this first
These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.
“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.
Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.
unverifiable
3 claimsNo source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.
- #4[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: December 2022 Smart Contract Exploit
“with compensation capped at $5,000 per affected user in phases, covering approximately 49 affected users”
reviewerCompensation from founders' personal savings, capped at $5,000 per user in phases, ~49 affected usersCap, personal savings and 49 users not found in the two cited sources I fetched; the Rubic weekly report was not checked. - #6[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Security Architecture Overhaul (2023)
“the launch of new audited contracts on April 3, 2023”
reviewerNew contracts launched April 3, 2023The year is not stated by the cited source. The same date appears in timeline[6]. - #10[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Ongoing Operations (2024-2025)
“As of early 2025, the platform supported 93 blockchains including newer networks such as Sui, Berachain, Fraxtal, Soneium, and Unichain.”
reviewerPlatform supported 93 blockchains in early 2025Messari/Blockworks reports were not fetched. The Rubic yearly report says only '90+ chains'.
partially supported
2 claimsThe cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.
- #2[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: November 2022 Private Key Compromise
“The attacker's wallet was observed holding over 205 BNB and $205,000 in ether at the time, suggesting broader threat actor resources.”
reviewerAttacker wallet held over 205 BNB and $205,000 in etherFigures match, but the source describes two wallets (BNB Chain and Ethereum). 'Broader threat actor resources' is an editorial inference. - #5[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: December 2022 Smart Contract Exploit
“Approximately 1,188 ETH (roughly $1.45 million) was then laundered through Tornado Cash.”
reviewerApproximately 1,188 ETH (~$1.45M) laundered via Tornado CashDollar figure supported; exact ETH count differs from the 1,100 ETH in the fetched source.
confirmed
5 claimsThe cited evidence supports the claim as written.
- #1[confirmed][no action needed]in section: November 2022 Private Key Compromise
“Approximately 34 million RBC and BRBC tokens were drained from this wallet and sold on Uniswap and PancakeSwap”
reviewerNov 2, 2022 admin key compromise drained ~34M RBC/BRBC worth ~$1.2M, sold on Uniswap and PancakeSwapCoinDesk matches amount, date and venues. - #3[confirmed][no action needed]in section: December 2022 Smart Contract Exploit
“a smart contract exploit that resulted in approximately $1.4 million in user USDC being stolen”
reviewerDec 25, 2022 exploit stole ~$1.4M USDC; funds laundered via Tornado CashAmount and Tornado Cash laundering supported. - #7[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Security Architecture Overhaul (2023)
“A Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) named Alex, with approximately 15 years of IT and security engineering experience including prior work at Yandex and QIWI, was hired.”
reviewerCISO Alex with ~15 years experience including Yandex and QIWISupported. - #8[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Security Architecture Overhaul (2023)
“After developer revisions, both critical findings and one medium finding were resolved.”
reviewerMixBytes audit: 2 critical, 2 medium, 1 low; both critical and one medium resolvedConsistent with the source. - #9[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Ongoing Operations (2024-2025)
“By 2024 the platform reported 828,000+ transactions processed (97% year-over-year growth), $391.5 million in total volume (82% growth), and over 369,000 unique wallets.”
reviewer2024 metrics: 828K+ transactions, $391.5M volume, 369K+ walletsMatches the self-reported report, and the page discloses that these figures are self-reported.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.