← Quant Networkreviewed 2026-09-09 · 21 claims checked
Fact-check findings
What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Quant Network against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.
Read this first
These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.
“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.
Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.
disputed
4 claimsThe reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. This is a lead, not a ruling that the claim is false.
- #4[disputed][awaiting moderator]in section: Overledger Technology
“Overledger Fusion (Layer 2.5) launched in May 2025.”
reviewerOverledger Fusion (Layer 2.5) launched in May 2025The page conflates the May 2025 announcement of Overledger Fusion with an actual launch. Trade press reporting shows phased rollout began June 2025 and mainnet did not go live until June 2, 2026.Proposed correction (not yet applied)Overledger Fusion (Layer 2.5) was announced in May 2025, with phased rollout beginning in June 2025 and the network's mainnet going live in June 2026. - #5[disputed][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
“Overledger Fusion (Layer 2.5) launched”
reviewerOverledger Fusion (Layer 2.5) launched (timeline entry)Same underlying date/characterization error as the Overledger Technology section; the event text should distinguish 'announced' from 'launched'.Proposed correction (not yet applied)Overledger Fusion (Layer 2.5) announced; phased rollout began June 2025 with mainnet going live in June 2026citedwww.quant.network/ - #7[disputed][awaiting moderator]in section: Verified Institutional Partnerships
“UK Regulated Liability Network involves Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, NatWest, Nationwide, and Santander — confirmed by UK Finance and Ledger Insights.”
reviewerUK Regulated Liability Network involves Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, NatWest, Nationwide, and SantanderThe page's own cited sources list eleven RLN Experimentation Phase participants, not six. The six-bank list appears to have been carried over from the separate, later GBTD tokenised-deposit pilot (correctly described in the following sentence of the same section) and mistakenly applied to the RLN phase itself.Proposed correction (not yet applied)UK Regulated Liability Network experimentation phase involved eleven institutions — Barclays, Citi UK, HSBC, Lloyds, Mastercard, NatWest, Nationwide, Santander, Standard Chartered, Virgin Money, and Visa, with Quant and R3 selected as technology partners — confirmed by UK Finance and Ledger Insights. - #8[disputed][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
“UK Regulated Liability Network experimentation phase with six major banks”
reviewerUK Regulated Liability Network experimentation phase with six major banks (timeline entry)Same underlying participant-count error as sections[2].Proposed correction (not yet applied)UK Regulated Liability Network experimentation phase with eleven institutions (nine banks and two card networks)
unverifiable
2 claimsNo source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.
- #14[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Regulatory Status
“No FCA authorization found, but Quant collaborates with FCA-regulated banks.”
reviewerNo FCA authorization found for Quant Network, though it collaborates with FCA-regulated banksPlausible and consistent with Quant's role as a technology vendor rather than a regulated financial firm, but I could not independently query the FCA register to confirm this negative claim, and the cited source does not address FCA status at all. - #15[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Regulatory Status
“No court filings or fraud findings identified.”
reviewerNo court filings or fraud findings identified against Quant NetworkA sweeping negative claim (no court filings anywhere) cannot be fully verified with web search and SEC-database checks alone; no adverse findings surfaced, but this does not rule out non-indexed or foreign proceedings.
partially supported
5 claimsThe cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.
- #3[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Overledger Technology
“Overledger is a closed-source, proprietary API interoperability gateway. It has been criticized for lack of open-source auditability and historically sparse public GitHub activity through 2022.”
reviewerOverledger is closed-source/proprietary and has been criticized for lack of open-source auditability and sparse public GitHub activity through 2022The underlying claim (closed-source, criticized GitHub sparsity in 2022) is independently verifiable, but one of the two cited sources (bestdapps.com) does not actually address either topic; only coincodecap.com supports it. - #6[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
“https://www.quant.network/”
reviewerOverledger Fusion launch is sourced to quant.network's homepageThe citation is a bare homepage URL rather than a dated article, which is weak sourcing practice even though the underlying announcement date is correct.citedwww.quant.network/ - #13[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Regulatory Status
“FINMA classifies QNT as a utility token.”
reviewerFINMA classifies QNT as a utility tokenThe underlying claim is widely corroborated, but the only source cited in this section (UK Companies House) has nothing to do with Swiss FINMA or token classification — a citation mismatch. - #16[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Token Economics
“Hard cap of 14.6M tokens. 68% sold at ICO for ~$11M (well below $40M target). 9.5M tokens burned post-ICO. 12-month lock mechanism for developer licenses. The company retains ~2M reserve tokens with no public audit of holdings.”
reviewerHard cap of 14.6M QNT tokens; 68% sold at ICO for ~$11M (below $40M target); 9.5M tokens burned post-ICO; 12-month lock mechanism for developer licenses; company retains ~2M reserve tokens with no public auditEvery individual figure in this paragraph checks out against independent sources (ICO raise, hard cap, burn amount, 12-month license lock, reserve allocation), but the single cited source (bestdapps.com) supports none of it. The reserve figure is also slightly understated (~2.6M actual vs ~2M stated). Recommend swapping the citation for a source that actually contains these figures, e.g. coinbureau.com's review. - #17[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Closed-Source and Centralization Concerns
“Overledger's closed-source nature limits independent security auditing. Governance is centralized under Quant Network Ltd. The developer licensing model requires payment, creating barriers to ecosystem participation.”
reviewerOverledger's closed-source nature limits independent security auditing; governance is centralized under Quant Network Ltd; developer licensing requires paymentThe pay-to-play licensing claim and closed-source characterization are independently well-supported (Quant's core technology is patented/proprietary per multiple sources), but the single cited source in this section does not itself discuss governance centralization or closed-source auditability.
confirmed
10 claimsThe cited evidence supports the claim as written.
- #1[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Founder and Corporate Structure
“Gilbert Verdian founded Quant Network Ltd (UK Companies House #09798383, incorporated 2015).”
reviewerGilbert Verdian founded Quant Network Ltd, UK Companies House #09798383, incorporated 2015Company number and incorporation year confirmed directly against Companies House. - #2[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Founder and Corporate Structure
“Verdian previously held roles at government agencies including the UK Treasury and Australian government.”
reviewerVerdian previously held roles at the UK Treasury and Australian governmentIndependently corroborated by Quant's own bio page and third-party profile (Forbes). - #9[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Verified Institutional Partnerships
“Project Rosalind with Bank of England and BIS completed successfully.”
reviewerProject Rosalind with Bank of England and BIS completed successfullyCompletion confirmed by BIS's own June 2023 release; timeline year '2023' is consistent. - #10[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Verified Institutional Partnerships
“UK GBTD tokenised sterling deposits pilot with six major banks active through mid-2026.”
reviewerUK GBTD tokenised sterling deposits pilot with six major banks active through mid-2026Correctly distinguished from the larger RLN experimentation phase; this six-bank figure is accurate for the GBTD pilot specifically. - #11[confirmed][no action needed]in section: ECB Digital Euro Partnership
“Quant is widely reported as an ECB Digital Euro pioneer partner. The ECB's press release confirms ~70 organizations were selected, though Quant's name does not appear in the ECB release text directly — it is reported in trade press.”
reviewerQuant is widely reported as an ECB Digital Euro pioneer partner, though not named directly in the ECB's own releaseThis is a well-hedged, accurate claim; the page correctly notes the discrepancy between trade-press attribution and the ECB's own text. - #12[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Regulatory Status
“No SEC enforcement actions.”
reviewerNo SEC enforcement actions exist against Quant NetworkConfirmed by absence in SEC's public enforcement database, though the cited source (Companies House) does not itself address SEC matters — this claim is effectively uncited on the page. - #18[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Third-Party Scams
“Active QNT airdrop and rewards impersonation scams have been documented. These are unaffiliated with Quant Network but exploit the brand.”
reviewerActive QNT airdrop and rewards impersonation scams have been documented, unaffiliated with Quant NetworkConfirmed and even under-cited — a second PCrisk scam guide (rewards scam) exists that could be added as an additional source. - #19[confirmed][no action needed]in the timeline
“Quant Network Ltd incorporated in the UK (Companies House #09798383)”
reviewerQuant Network Ltd incorporated in the UK, Companies House #09798383 (timeline entry)Date and event both confirmed. - #20[confirmed][no action needed]in the timeline
“QNT ICO raises ~$11M (below $40M target); 9.5M tokens burned post-ICO”
reviewerQNT ICO raises ~$11M (below $40M target); 9.5M tokens burned post-ICO (timeline entry)Same citation-mismatch issue as the Token Economics section (bestdapps.com doesn't contain these figures), but the figures themselves are independently confirmed. - #21[confirmed][no action needed]in the timeline
“ECB Digital Euro Innovation Platform partner selection announced”
reviewerECB Digital Euro Innovation Platform partner selection announced 2025-05-05 (timeline entry)Date and cited source both check out.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.