Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← Plasma (XPL)reviewed 2026-10-27 · 11 claims checked

Fact-check findings

What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Plasma (XPL) against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.

Read this first

These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.

“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.

Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.

unverifiable 4partially supported 3confirmed 40 corrections pending · 0 applied

unverifiable

4 claims

No source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.

  1. #6[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Token Distribution, Unlocks, and Lockups
    “Independent on-chain analysis reported that roughly 600 million of the ~800 million XPL tokens unlocked at launch (8% of total supply) were subsequently sent to exchanges from project-controlled wallets, which analysts identified as a major source of early sell pressure”
    reviewerOn-chain analysis showed about 600 million of ~800 million unlocked XPL were sent to exchanges from project-controlled walletsThe likely cited source was blocked and the CoinDesk article does not contain the figure. The claim is neither confirmed nor refuted. Note the page's own 8% launch unlock (800M) differs from CoinDesk's 1.8B circulating at launch, which includes ICO tokens.
  2. #9[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
    “DeFiLlama shows Plasma stablecoin supply down to roughly $710 million and DeFi TVL near $630 million, down sharply from a reported peak above $6 billion shortly after launch.”
    reviewerMid-August 2026 DeFiLlama showed about $710M stablecoins and $630M DeFi TVLThe primary page was blocked. A live-time snapshot cannot be tied to a mid-August date. The order of magnitude is similar, but I cannot confirm the exact figures. The Archive snapshot (2026-08-02) was not checked.
  3. #10[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Stablecoin TVL and Liquidity: Claims vs. Reality
    “by mid-August 2026 DeFiLlama showed roughly $710 million in stablecoins and about $630 million in DeFi TVL on the chain”
    reviewerBy mid-August 2026 DeFiLlama showed roughly $710M stablecoins and $630M TVL (section prose)Same underlying figures as timeline[7]; see that finding.
  4. #11[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Stablecoin TVL and Liquidity: Claims vs. Reality
    “Plasma's stablecoin supply fell from a peak above $6 billion to less than $2 billion within about two months of launch”
    reviewerA search for the TVL peak and the stablecoin supply decline: supply fell from above $6B to under $2B within about two monthsDeFiLlama pages were blocked and I found no alternative corroborating source. Search results also showed conflicting launch-day figures ($2B committed vs measured TVL), so the peak definition is uncertain.

partially supported

3 claims

The cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.

  1. #1[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
    “Plasma raises approximately $20-24 million in a Seed/Series A round co-led by Framework Ventures and Bitfinex/USDT0.”
    reviewerThe Feb 2025 round was co-led by Framework Ventures and Bitfinex/USDT0Date and amount are supported. The co-lead attribution to Bitfinex/USDT0 is not in the cited CoinDesk article, which names only Framework as lead.
  2. #2[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Origins, Team, and Backers
    “Early financial backers included Bitfinex, Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino, Peter Thiel's Founders Fund, Framework Ventures, and crypto traders Cobie and Zaheer Ebtikar.”
    reviewerEarly backers included Peter Thiel's Founders FundBacker list matches except 'Founders Fund', which the CoinDesk source does not state (it says Peter Thiel). I did not check other cited sources for the fund attribution.
  3. #5[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Token Distribution, Unlocks, and Lockups
    “Founder Paul Faecks stated publicly that no team members had sold XPL and that all investor and team token allocations are locked for three years with a one-year cliff.”
    reviewerTeam and investor allocations are locked for three years with a one-year cliffSchedule is consistent with the docs, but the 2026-09-25 cliff has passed so those allocations are now partly unlocking. The page does not say so. The BeInCrypto quote could not be read.

confirmed

4 claims

The cited evidence supports the claim as written.

  1. #3[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Token Distribution, Unlocks, and Lockups
    “40% of total XPL supply (4 billion tokens) is allocated to ecosystem growth, with 8% unlocked at mainnet launch and the remaining 32% released linearly over roughly three years”
    reviewerEcosystem allocation is 40% (4B XPL), 8% unlocked at launch and 32% linearly over about three yearsMatches the official docs.
  2. #4[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Token Distribution, Unlocks, and Lockups
    “XPL held by non-US purchasers was fully unlocked at mainnet beta launch on September 25, 2025, while XPL held by US purchasers is subject to a 12-month lockup unlocking around July 28, 2026.”
    reviewerUS purchasers' XPL has a 12-month lockup unlocking around July 28, 2026; non-US fully unlocked at launchConfirmed. The present tense is now stale since the date has passed (today 2026-10-27), but the substance is accurate.
  3. #7[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Price Performance and Token Crash
    “CoinDesk reported that Plasma's leadership repeatedly declined interview requests and ultimately stated it was 'not in a position to comment' when asked about the crash”
    reviewerCoinDesk reported leadership declined interviews and said it was 'not in a position to comment'Substance confirmed. The quoted phrase is a slight paraphrase of the original wording.
  4. #8[confirmed][no action needed]in the timeline
    “CoinDesk reports XPL down roughly 88-90% from peak, network usage far below advertised throughput (3.6 TPS vs. ~1,000 TPS claimed), and Plasma leadership declining interview requests.”
    reviewerChain processed 3.6 TPS versus about 1,000 TPS touted, and XPL was down 88-90% from peak on 2025-11-26Confirmed.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.