Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← PAAL AIreviewed 2026-11-02 · 8 claims checked

Fact-check findings

What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read PAAL AI against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.

Read this first

These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.

“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.

Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.

unverifiable 1stale 3partially supported 1confirmed 33 corrections pending · 0 applied

unverifiable

1 claim

No source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.

  1. #8[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Team Transparency
    “The project is reportedly headquartered in Port Blair, India according to company profiling databases.”
    reviewerTeam details (Simon Flom CEO, Port Blair HQ)Not independently checked. The page hedges with 'reportedly'.
    citedtracxn.com/d/companies/paal/__Ua9Mu1nuZT…-HNeSqtGZRlTfPj8

stale

3 claims

The claim was accurate when written but events since have overtaken it.

  1. #1[stale][awaiting moderator]in section: Token Price Performance and Retail Losses
    “By mid-2026, PAAL trades at approximately $0.012, representing a decline of approximately 98.7% from its all-time high.”
    reviewerBy mid-2026 PAAL trades at about $0.012, a ~98.7% decline from ATHPrice has fallen well below $0.012 by mid-2026. Fully diluted market cap of about $12 million also no longer holds (about $7M).
    Proposed correction (not yet applied)
    By mid-2026, PAAL trades at approximately $0.007, representing a decline of approximately 99% from its all-time high.
    citedwww.coingecko.com/en/coins/paal-ai
  2. #2[stale][awaiting moderator]in section: Token Price Performance and Retail Losses
    “the token's fully diluted market capitalization at current prices is approximately $12 million USD”
    reviewerFully diluted market cap at current prices about $12 millionSuperseded by current CoinGecko data.
    Proposed correction (not yet applied)
    the token's fully diluted market capitalization at current prices is approximately $7 million USD
    citedcoinmarketcap.com/currencies/paal-ai/
  3. #3[stale][awaiting moderator]in the summary
    “The token subsequently declined approximately 98.7% from its March 2024 all-time high of $0.8653 to below $0.013 by mid-2026”
    reviewerSummary: decline of ~98.7% to below $0.013 by mid-2026Technically 'below $0.013' is true, but the 98.7% figure is outdated. CoinGecko lists the ATH as $0.8598, slightly different from $0.8653.
    Proposed correction (not yet applied)
    The token subsequently declined approximately 99% from its March 2024 all-time high of $0.8653 to below $0.008 by mid-2026

partially supported

1 claim

The cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.

  1. #5[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
    “PAAL AI reaches a local high of approximately $0.0451, up roughly 5x from August 1 levels.”
    reviewerTimeline: 3 Sept local high of $0.0451 vs. 9 Sept $0.045 (duplicate/inconsistent dates)Page gives both Sept 3 and Sept 9 for the same peak. BeInCrypto was unreadable (403), so the Sept 3 date is unverified.
    citedbeincrypto.com/crypto-trader-paal-ai-pump-and-dump/

confirmed

3 claims

The cited evidence supports the claim as written.

  1. #4[confirmed][no action needed]in section: ZachXBT Pump-and-Dump Allegations (September 2023)
    “TraderSZ subsequently dumped his entire position, netting over $130,000.”
    reviewerTraderSZ received 4M PAAL from team on Aug 10 and dumped all for over $130,000; price rose $0.009 to $0.045The allegation is attributed correctly. The $0.028 price and the TraderNJ1 $120k, CBOT/BABYSHIB and 2.67m quote details were not checked: BeInCrypto returned 403.
    citedcoinchapter.com/paal-ai-token-involved-i…tradersz-blamed/
  2. #6[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Third-Party Staking Scam Exploiting PAAL Brand
    “In August 2024, security researchers documented a fraudulent website impersonating the PAAL AI staking platform.”
    reviewerFake staking site mypaal-reward.pages[.]dev documented in August 2024Supported.
    citedwww.pcrisk.com/removal-guides/30644-paal-staking-scam
  3. #7[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Smart Contract and Audit Status
    “However, the analysis also noted that the contract contains self-destruction functionality, which means token data could theoretically be removed.”
    reviewerContract has self-destruct functionality per HashExConfirmed by search snippet only. It is an automated audit.
    citedhashex.org/auto-audits/ethereum/0x14fee6…d70fd1b95d10e16/
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.