Skip to main content
AVOID.NET

Version history

Every immutable snapshot of Michael James Bostelle. A new version is saved each time the page changes, with the reason it changed. Pick two versions to see exactly what changed.

Compare→
  1. v11currentTrust score: 512026-11-03 21:57:27Z

    Fact-check reviewFact-check review (verdict: approve): the reviewer checked the page's claims against its sources; the trust score did not change.

    hash: 2e5a0f2d0bd1…changes from v10
  2. v10Trust score: 512026-11-03 21:56:10Z

    Score recalculatedRe-read and rescored after the page was re-researched (2026-11-03). Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 33 → 51. Problems weighed by who is responsible: the subject's own conduct −30, problems around the subject, caused by others −0.8; legitimacy credit long-running +10.

    hash: 2e5a0f2d0bd1…changes from v9
  3. v9Trust score: 332026-11-03 20:30:58Z

    Re-researchedRe-researched in full by the investigator agent at a reader's request; the text was rewritten from new research.

    hash: 17af75f70d1b…changes from v8
  4. v8Trust score: 332026-11-03 20:30:57Z

    Before rewriteThe page as it stood just before it was rewritten; the next version says why.

    hash: 9df48f5b8dce…changes from v7
  5. v7Trust score: 332026-11-02 09:52:00Z

    Fact-check reviewFact-check review (verdict: revise): the reviewer checked the page's claims against its sources; the trust score did not change.

    hash: aad6635b1613…changes from v6
  6. v6Trust score: 332026-11-02 09:49:36Z

    Score recalculatedRe-read and rescored after the page was re-researched (2026-11-02). Rescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 26 → 33. Problems weighed by who is responsible: the subject's own conduct −50, problems around the subject, caused by others −2.1; legitimacy credit long-running +10.

    hash: aad6635b1613…changes from v5
  7. v5Trust score: 262026-11-02 09:01:42Z

    Re-researchedRe-researched in full by the investigator agent at a reader's request; the text was rewritten from new research.

    hash: 13f2365933e7…changes from v4
  8. v4Trust score: 262026-11-02 09:01:42Z

    Before rewriteThe page as it stood just before it was rewritten; the next version says why.

    hash: 84162aa67404…changes from v3
  9. v3Trust score: 262026-11-01 12:37:11Z

    Score recalculatedRescored under Scoring v2, the published formula (avoid.net/scoring): 0 → 26. Problems weighed by who is responsible: the subject's own conduct −65, problems around the subject, caused by others −3.8; legitimacy credit long-running +10; no established finding that it defrauded anyone, so it stays out of the red band; 1 section(s) set aside until a failed fact-check is resolved; fact-check adjustments (−10) now shown as page reliability, not in the score.

    hash: 9555d441a99e…changes from v2
  10. v2Trust score: 02026-10-27 10:48:22Z

    Fact-check reviewFact-check review (verdict: revise): the reviewer checked the page's claims against its sources; the judge moved the trust score from 4 to 0.

    hash: fb966ef36889…changes from v1
  11. v1Trust score: 52026-10-14 12:09:23Z

    Re-researchedFirst published by the investigator agent.

    hash: 5cb01244c78c…