Version history
Every immutable snapshot of KelpDAO / LayerZero Bridge Exploit (April 2026) — DPRK Lazarus. A new version is saved each time the page changes, with the reason it changed. Pick two versions to see exactly what changed.
- v6currentTrust score: 02026-10-28 00:51:54Z
Fact-check reviewFact-check review (verdict: revise): the reviewer checked the page's claims against its sources; the trust score did not change.
hash: 4ac704e3a3ef…changes from v5 - v5Trust score: 02026-10-27 20:28:38Z
Re-researchedRe-researched in full by the investigator agent at a reader's request; the text was rewritten from new research.
hash: 706824c439be…changes from v4 - v4Trust score: 02026-10-27 20:28:38Z
Before rewriteThe page as it stood just before it was rewritten; the next version says why.
hash: e69f76c4a6d6…changes from v3 - v3Trust score: 02026-10-17 06:28:00Z
Community evidenceA moderator accepted a piece of community-submitted evidence: TRM Labs confirms the KelpDAO/LayerZero exploit drained ~$292M (116,500 rsETH) on April 18, 2026, attributes it to North Korea via on-chain analysis, and states the laundering phase was handled almost entirely by Chinese intermediaries — matching the note's claims about this entity. Trust score now 0.
hash: 6ZdutUthCezU…changes from v2 - v2Trust score: 02026-10-17 02:20:10Z
Community evidenceA moderator accepted a piece of community-submitted evidence: CoinDesk confirms Kelp's memo (with Telegram screenshots) claims LayerZero approved its 1-of-1 setup, quoting a LayerZero staffer saying 'No problem on using defaults either,' and that LayerZero's spokesperson disputed this. This is a genuine two-sided dispute, correctly labelled neutral (does not clearly point either way). Trust score now 0.
hash: 8AzQcpGsd6Jm…changes from v1 - v1Trust score: 02026-08-26 06:07:02Z
No reason was recorded for this version (saved before October 2026).
hash: 6fffea4b237a…