Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← Huobi / HTXreviewed 2026-10-16 · 31 claims checked

Fact-check findings

What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Huobi / HTX against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.

Read this first

These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.

“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.

Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.

disputed

3 claims

The reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. This is a lead, not a ruling that the claim is false.

  1. #7[disputed][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
    “Garantex successor exchange Grinex halts operations following continued international enforcement pressure.”
    reviewerGrinex halted operations in April 2026 following continued international enforcement pressure.The cited source (a CoinDesk article about the May 26 UK sanctions, not about Grinex specifically) does not support this causal claim. Independent reporting attributes the April 2026 halt to a disclosed cyberattack/hack, not generically to 'enforcement pressure.'
    Proposed correction (not yet applied)
    Garantex successor exchange Grinex halts operations after disclosing a cyberattack it said caused losses of roughly USD 13 million.
  2. #16[disputed][awaiting moderator]in section: FCA Legal Proceedings — Illegal Financial Promotions
    “Several social media platforms complied with FCA requests to restrict HTX access for UK-based consumers: TikTok blocked HTX content by approximately February 2024, Meta blocked Facebook and Instagram access by approximately May 2024, and Telegram followed by approximately October 2024.”
    reviewerTikTok blocked HTX content by approximately February 2024, Meta blocked Facebook/Instagram by approximately May 2024, and Telegram followed by approximately October 2024.The underlying FCA action did not exist until October 2025 (filed) / February 2026 (announced), so platform compliance in 2024 is chronologically impossible on the record found; Telegram is not named by the FCA as one of the platforms involved at all.
    Proposed correction (not yet applied)
    Following the FCA's February 2026 action, HTX's Facebook, Instagram and TikTok pages were reported inaccessible to UK users; the FCA named TikTok, X, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube as the platforms carrying HTX promotions, and has not reported any comparable action by Telegram.
  3. #20[disputed][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
    “2026-03-06”
    reviewerThe SEC dismissal and Rainberry settlement occurred on March 6, 2026.Secondary reporting places the court filing/entry on March 5, 2026 rather than March 6; sources show minor day-level disagreement between 'filed' and 'entered' dates, so confidence in the exact day is moderate but the weight of reporting favors March 5.
    Proposed correction (not yet applied)
    2026-03-05

unverifiable

1 claim

No source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.

  1. #30[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Background and Corporate History
    “The exchange confirmed Sun's leadership role in official communications, stating it had 'embarked on the path to rebirth' under his direction.”
    reviewerHTX stated it had 'embarked on the path to rebirth' under Justin Sun's direction.Could not independently confirm this specific quote; the cited source could not be retrieved due to a server error, and no secondary source reproduces the phrase. Not contradicted, just unverified.

partially supported

2 claims

The cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.

  1. #15[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: FCA Legal Proceedings — Illegal Financial Promotions
    “The FCA described the proceedings as its first court action against a crypto firm for illegally marketing products to UK consumers. The regulator stated that repeated attempts to engage with HTX had been ignored. The FCA asked Apple and Google to remove HTX applications from UK app stores.”
    reviewerThe FCA described the HTX action as its first court action against a crypto firm for illegally marketing products to UK consumers; the FCA said repeated attempts to engage with HTX had been ignored, and asked Apple/Google to remove HTX apps.The 'ignored engagement' and app-store removal claims are confirmed verbatim; the 'first court action... for illegally marketing' framing is the page's gloss on a slightly differently worded FCA quote about its first enforcement action generally.
  2. #17[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Industry Impact and Exchange Responses
    “Binance stated that transactions involving HTX 'may be subject to additional compliance review.' OKX warned users engaged in cross-exchange arbitrage with HTX that continued transfers could trigger enhanced account scrutiny. Bybit cautioned that deposits or withdrawals linked to HTX addresses 'may face added anti-money laundering and risk-control checks.'”
    reviewerBinance, OKX, Bybit, and Bitget each warned of enhanced compliance scrutiny for HTX-linked transactions after the UK sanctions.Binance and OKX characterizations confirmed closely; the Bybit quote as rendered on the page does not match the exact wording retrieved from the cited article, though the substance (enhanced scrutiny) is consistent.

confirmed

25 claims

The cited evidence supports the claim as written.

  1. #1[confirmed][no action needed]in the summary
    “was designated by the UK government on May 26, 2026 under the Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, marking the first time the UK applied banking-style Regulation 17A correspondent-banking sanctions to a crypto exchange of this scale”
    reviewerUK FCDO designated Huobi Global S.A. on May 26, 2026 under the Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, applying Regulation 17A banking-style correspondent-banking sanctions to a crypto exchange for the first time at this scale.Confirmed by the primary UK sanctions notice and corroborated independently by Elliptic and The Block.
  2. #2[confirmed][no action needed]in the summary
    “alleged that the Panama-registered operating entity, Huobi Global S.A., channeled approximately USD 1.5 billion to Russia-linked entities — including the A7 payments network and previously sanctioned exchange Garantex”
    reviewerThe UK alleged Huobi Global S.A. channeled approximately USD 1.5 billion to Russia-linked entities including A7 and Garantex.Figure corroborated by independent wire coverage of the UK government's own statement.
  3. #3[confirmed][no action needed]in section: UK Sanctions Designation — May 26, 2026
    “The official UK sanctions notice (issued May 26, 2026) identifies Huobi Global S.A. with Panama registration number 155737650.”
    reviewerHuobi Global S.A. is registered in Panama under Folio Number 155737650.Exact match to primary source, cross-checked against OpenSanctions.
  4. #4[confirmed][no action needed]in section: UK Sanctions Designation — May 26, 2026
    “The action was part of a broader package targeting 18 entities and individuals alleged to be part of a cryptocurrency network facilitating Russia's evasion of international trade restrictions imposed in response to its invasion of Ukraine.”
    reviewerThe designation was part of a broader package targeting 18 entities and individuals.Count corroborated both in the extracted primary document and secondary reporting.
  5. #5[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Alleged Connections to the A7 Network and Garantex
    “Garantex was a Russia-based cryptocurrency exchange sanctioned by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) in April 2022 for processing over USD 100 million in transactions linked to illicit actors, ransomware groups (including Conti), and darknet markets.”
    reviewerGarantex was sanctioned by OFAC on April 5, 2022 for processing over USD 100 million tied to illicit actors including Conti ransomware and darknet markets.Matches timeline[1].date (2022-04-05) and is independently corroborated.
  6. #6[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Alleged Connections to the A7 Network and Garantex
    “Garantex continued to operate after the OFAC designation and was physically dismantled by an international law enforcement operation in March 2025, subsequently rebranding as Grinex before halting operations in April 2026.”
    reviewerGarantex was dismantled by law enforcement in March 2025 and rebranded as Grinex, which halted operations in April 2026.The fact of the halt is confirmed, though the page's timeline entry mischaracterizes the cause (see separate finding on timeline[11]).
  7. #8[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Alleged Connections to the A7 Network and Garantex
    “The A7A5 stablecoin — pegged to the Russian ruble and issued in Kyrgyzstan — processed an alleged USD 9.3 billion in its first four months.”
    reviewerThe A7A5 ruble-pegged stablecoin processed approximately USD 9.3 billion in its first four months.Confirmed by independent reporting beyond the cited sources.
  8. #9[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Alleged Connections to the A7 Network and Garantex
    “UK officials alleged the A7 network moved more than USD 90 billion into Russia's economy in 2025 alone, including proceeds from Russian oil sales and military procurement transactions.”
    reviewerUK officials alleged the A7 network moved more than USD 90 billion into Russia's economy in 2025 alone, including proceeds from oil sales and military procurement.The page appropriately hedges this as a UK-official allegation rather than an independently verified figure, which matches how the primary government release frames it (as the network's own claim).
  9. #10[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Alleged Connections to the A7 Network and Garantex
    “On-chain analytics firm TRM Labs reported that HTX sent more than USD 4.9 billion to UK-designated and A7-network entities since 2021, including: USD 1.95 billion to Garantex in 2022, USD 1.18 billion to Garantex-linked entities in 2023, and USD 838 million to the A7 network in 2025.”
    reviewerTRM Labs reported HTX sent more than USD 4.9 billion to UK-designated and A7-network entities since 2021, with a tenfold post-takedown increase in flows to successor exchanges (USD 111 million to USD 1.13 billion).All figures verified by direct retrieval of the cited TRM Labs blog post; the breakdown matches exactly.
  10. #11[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Alleged Connections to the A7 Network and Garantex
    “A separate analysis by blockchain intelligence firm Global Ledger identified approximately USD 7.64 billion in Russia-linked high-risk flows through HTX between 2021 and May 2026, representing a portion of USD 21.06 billion in total high-risk flows.”
    reviewerGlobal Ledger identified approximately USD 7.64 billion in Russia-linked high-risk flows through HTX between 2021 and May 2026, out of USD 21.06 billion in total high-risk flows, also flagging Huione Group, Nobitex, Hezbollah-linked addresses, and Lazarus Group.Exact match to the cited article's reported figures.
  11. #12[confirmed][no action needed]in section: HTX Response and Denial
    “The exchange maintained that the designation 'does not and should not have any impact on the online HTX exchange' and stated that user funds remain unaffected.”
    reviewerHTX stated the UK designation 'does not and should not have any impact on the online HTX exchange' and that Huobi Global S.A. is a legally distinct entity.Direct quote verified against the cited article.
  12. #13[confirmed][no action needed]in section: HTX Response and Denial
    “The UK Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) interpreted the designation to cover the operating exchange on the basis that Huobi Global S.A. owns more than 50 percent of the shares in the HTX operating platform, making the exchange itself subject to asset freeze and making-available sanctions under the 50 percent ownership rule standard in UK sanctions law.”
    reviewerOFSI interpreted the designation to cover the operating exchange because Huobi Global S.A. owns more than 50 percent of the HTX operating platform.Independently corroborated via Decrypt's reporting on OFSI's position.
  13. #14[confirmed][no action needed]in section: FCA Legal Proceedings — Illegal Financial Promotions
    “Prior to the May 2026 sanctions designation, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) initiated separate legal proceedings against HTX in October 2025 for allegedly breaching UK financial promotions rules.”
    reviewerThe UK FCA initiated legal proceedings against HTX in October 2025 for breaching UK financial promotions rules.Confirmed at month granularity; the public announcement came later (Feb 2026) but the court filing date matches October 2025.
  14. #18[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Justin Sun — SEC Charges and Settlement
    “The SEC alleged that from at least April 2018 through February 2019, Sun directed employees to conduct more than 600,000 wash trades of TRX between accounts he controlled, with between 4.5 million and 7.4 million TRX allegedly wash traded daily. The SEC also alleged Sun sold TRX into secondary markets, generating approximately USD 31 million in proceeds from alleged unregistered securities offerings.”
    reviewerIn March 2023, the SEC charged Justin Sun and three companies with unregistered securities offerings, fraud, wash trading, and an undisclosed celebrity endorsement scheme, alleging 600,000+ wash trades and USD 31 million in proceeds.Matches timeline[3].date (2023-03-22) and is fully corroborated.
  15. #19[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Justin Sun — SEC Charges and Settlement
    “In March 2026, the SEC dismissed the fraud and market manipulation charges against Sun personally and against the Tron and BitTorrent foundations, with all charges against Sun dismissed with prejudice. Rainberry Inc. paid a USD 10 million penalty.”
    reviewerIn March 2026, the SEC dismissed the fraud and market manipulation charges against Sun with prejudice; Rainberry Inc. paid a USD 10 million penalty.Substance confirmed; see separate finding on the specific timeline date, which is off by one day from the best-supported court date.
  16. #21[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Security Incidents
    “On September 24, 2023, HTX's hot wallet was compromised due to an alleged private key leak, resulting in the loss of approximately USD 7.9 million worth of ETH (4,999 ETH). HTX identified the attacker and sent an on-chain message demanding return of funds minus a 5% white-hat bonus within seven days.”
    reviewerOn September 24, 2023, HTX's hot wallet was compromised, losing approximately 4,999 ETH (USD 7.9 million); the attacker was given a seven-day deadline and a 5% white-hat bonus offer.Well corroborated across multiple independent outlets.
  17. #22[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Security Incidents
    “The attacker returned the stolen assets on October 7, 2023 and received approximately 250 ETH (valued at USD 408,666) as a white-hat bonus.”
    reviewerThe attacker returned the stolen assets on October 7, 2023 and received approximately 250 ETH (USD 408,666) as a white-hat bonus.Matches timeline[6].
  18. #23[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Security Incidents
    “Approximately USD 30 million was drained from HTX directly, and combined losses across HTX and HECO Chain were estimated at approximately USD 115 million.”
    reviewerIn November 2023, HTX and the HECO Chain bridge suffered a hack; approximately USD 30 million was drained from HTX directly, with combined losses of approximately USD 115 million.Direct CNBC fetch returned HTTP 403, but the reported figures are independently corroborated via outlets that cite the same underlying CNBC story.
  19. #24[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Background and Corporate History
    “HTX reports serving over 47 million users across more than 160 countries. The exchange recorded approximately USD 3.3 trillion in trading volume in 2025.”
    reviewerAs of 2026, HTX reports serving over 47 million users across more than 160 countries, with approximately USD 3.3 trillion in trading volume in 2025.Both figures are self-reported by HTX/the exchange but are independently repeated by a credible research source (Elliptic) and a review aggregator, so treated as adequately sourced rather than disputed. This same claim recurs in sections[8]; no correction needed in either location.
  20. #25[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Current Operational Status
    “HTX states it serves over 47 million users across more than 160 countries. The exchange reported USD 3.3 trillion in trading volume for 2025.”
    reviewerHTX reports serving over 47 million users across more than 160 countries, with USD 3.3 trillion in trading volume for 2025 (operational status section).Duplicate of the Background section's claim; see that finding for sourcing detail.
  21. #26[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Current Operational Status
    “The exchange publishes Merkle Tree Proof of Reserves and reported major reserve ratios above 100% in April 2026.”
    reviewerAs of June 2026, HTX publishes Merkle Tree Proof of Reserves and reported reserve ratios above 100% in April 2026.Confirmed by independent secondary coverage of the same monthly report.
  22. #27[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Background and Corporate History
    “In October 2022, Li sold his majority stake to Hong Kong-based About Capital Management, exiting the business entirely.”
    reviewerLeon Li sold his majority stake in Huobi to About Capital Management in October 2022, and Justin Sun acquired a controlling interest around the same time, with Li exiting all operational roles.Confirmed independently of the cited Wikipedia source.
  23. #28[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Background and Corporate History
    “cryptocurrency entrepreneur Justin Sun — founder of the Tron blockchain — acquired the exchange around the same time, though Sun has publicly characterized his role as that of a global advisor rather than a direct owner.”
    reviewerJustin Sun has publicly characterized his role at HTX as a global advisor rather than a direct owner, even though the exchange confirmed his leadership role.The page's hedged phrasing appropriately captures a genuine ambiguity/dispute in independent reporting rather than overstating either side.
  24. #29[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Background and Corporate History
    “In September 2023, Huobi rebranded to HTX, with Justin Sun announcing the name change at the TOKEN2049 event. The 'H' in HTX represents Huobi's legacy, 'T' represents Tron, and 'X' signifies the exchange function.”
    reviewerIn September 2023, Huobi rebranded to HTX, announced by Justin Sun at TOKEN2049, with H=Huobi, T=Tron, X=exchange.The Nasdaq source itself returned HTTP 503 on two fetch attempts and could not be directly verified; the claim is nonetheless corroborated by independent coverage of the same announcement.
  25. #31[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Background and Corporate History
    “Huobi was founded in 2013 by Leon Li (Leon Lin Li), a former Oracle software engineer and Tsinghua University alumnus. The exchange launched a Bitcoin trading platform on September 1, 2013, and by December 2013 had achieved trading volumes exceeding 30 billion yuan, becoming China's largest digital asset exchange at that time.”
    reviewerHuobi was founded in 2013 by Leon Li and launched a Bitcoin trading platform on September 1, 2013, achieving over 30 billion yuan in trading volume by December 2013.Matches the cited tertiary source; the underlying trading-volume figure is weakly sourced even on Wikipedia, a limitation worth noting but not disqualifying given it is attributed appropriately.
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.