Skip to main content
AVOID.NET
← Frontier (FRONT)reviewed 2026-10-27 · 11 claims checked

Fact-check findings

What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Frontier (FRONT) against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.

Read this first

These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.

“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.

Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.

disputed 4unverifiable 4partially supported 1confirmed 24 corrections pending · 0 applied

disputed

4 claims

The reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. This is a lead, not a ruling that the claim is false.

  1. #2[disputed][awaiting moderator]in section: Exchange Delistings and Regulatory Pressure
    “the successor token reached a peak of approximately $0.94 in August 2024 before collapsing.”
    reviewerSLF all-time high was about $0.94 in August 2024CoinGecko gives $0.8234; the page also contradicts itself (timeline has both $0.94 and $0.82 entries).
    Proposed correction (not yet applied)
    the successor token reached a peak of approximately $0.82 in August 2024 before collapsing.
    citedwww.coingecko.com/en/coins/self-chain
  2. #3[disputed][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
    “Binance completes FRONT-to-SLF token swap; SLF reaches approximate peak of $0.94”
    reviewerTimeline: SLF peak of $0.94 at swap completionSame ATH error as in sections[5]; conflicts with timeline[11] which says $0.82.
    Proposed correction (not yet applied)
    Binance completes FRONT-to-SLF token swap; SLF reaches approximate peak of $0.82
    citedwww.binance.com/en/support/announcement/…b6df3d958f14f38e
  3. #4[disputed][awaiting moderator]in section: Investor Background and Team
    “As of October 2026, the project's SLF token remains traded on low-volume venues.”
    reviewerSLF remains traded on low-volume venues as of October 2026The cited CoinGecko page says trading has stopped everywhere.
    Proposed correction (not yet applied)
    As of October 2026, CoinGecko reports that SLF tokens have stopped trading on all listed exchanges.
    citedwww.coingecko.com/en/coins/self-chain
  4. #5[disputed][awaiting moderator]in section: Investor Background and Team
    “The token's market capitalization had declined to approximately $62,000 by October 2026, with 24-hour trading volume of approximately $47,900, reflecting minimal market activity.”
    reviewer24-hour volume about $47,900Market cap is correct; volume figure is not supported by CoinGecko.
    Proposed correction (not yet applied)
    The token's market capitalization had declined to approximately $62,000 by October 2026, with CoinGecko reporting 24-hour trading volume of $0, reflecting no active market.
    citedwww.coingecko.com/en/coins/self-chain

unverifiable

4 claims

No source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.

  1. #8[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Legal and Regulatory Status
    “The complaint named, in addition to Kumar, individuals including Vaibhav Gupta (alias 'Gaptu') and Diwan Saurabh (alias 'Daku') in connection with misrepresentation of token deals and forged documents.”
    reviewerWaseem's police complaint named Vaibhav Gupta (Gaptu) and Diwan Saurabh (Daku)Names of private individuals not found in the cited DL News piece; the second DL News article and the Wave and Andaman piece were not checked. Naming living people warrants a direct source.
    citedwww.dlnews.com/articles/deals/self-chain…at-aza-ventures/
  2. #9[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Founder Fraud Allegations and CEO Removal
    “DL News reported one investor lost between $5 million and $10 million in a single transaction”
    reviewerOne investor lost $5-10 million in a single transactionCould be in the other DL News article, which was not fetched.
    citedwww.dlnews.com/articles/deals/self-chain…at-aza-ventures/
  3. #10[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Exchange Delistings and Regulatory Pressure
    “Bithumb, a South Korean exchange, suspended SLF deposits beginning August 7, 2025, citing concerns about code transparency and event controls.”
    reviewerBithumb suspended SLF deposits from August 7, 2025The cited source title and a search snippet describe a withdrawal halt tied to a chain halt, which differs from the page's wording. Not directly fetched.
    citedcryptorank.io/news/feed/eb7af-bithumb-sl…thdrawals-halted
  4. #11[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Token Price Performance
    “The SLF token fell to near $0.0001 in December 2025, representing an effective loss of over 99.9% from peak value.”
    reviewerSLF fell to near $0.0001 in December 2025Same section later gives $0.00037-$0.00044; the $0.0001 figure is not confirmed. Also internally inconsistent with the 'near $0.001' at delisting.
    citedwww.coingecko.com/en/coins/self-chain

partially supported

1 claim

The cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.

  1. #6[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Founder Fraud Allegations and CEO Removal
    “Indian authorities confirmed that a Ponzi scheme was being operated.”
    reviewerIndian authorities confirmed a Ponzi scheme was being operated (stated as fact)Page presents a complainant's claim as established fact; it needs attribution.
    citedwww.dlnews.com/articles/deals/self-chain…at-aza-ventures/

confirmed

2 claims

The cited evidence supports the claim as written.

  1. #1[confirmed][no action needed]in the summary
    “Binance delisted SLF on September 17, 2025, after which the token fell more than 99.9% from its peak.”
    reviewerBinance delisted SLF on September 17, 2025Delisting date and the >99.9% decline both check out against Binance and CoinGecko.
    citedwww.binance.com/en/support/announcement/…8c667dd0ca17e2e7
  2. #7[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Founder Fraud Allegations and CEO Removal
    “Kumar denied all allegations, stating 'I've been accused of serious wrongdoing, which is completely false,' and indicated his legal team would prepare a formal response.”
    reviewerKumar terminated June 2025, denied allegations; Source 1 and Berachain warningCore allegation, denial and termination are well sourced and framed as allegations.
    citedwww.coindesk.com/business/2025/06/23/sel…scam-allegations
How this fits together. The reviewer reads the published page and its cited sources and records one finding per claim. A human moderator decides whether each proposed correction is applied; those decisions, and the score changes they cause, appear in the audit log. Earlier review runs are not shown here; only the latest reflects the page as it stands.