Fact-check findings
What an automated fact-checker found when it re-read Fluent against the sources the page cites. Only the most recent review is shown.
These findings are produced by an automated reviewer, and its results vary between runs: the same page, checked three times on the same day, came back with 15%, 20% and 34% of its claims disputed, mostly because each run extracted a different number of claims. Treat what follows as leads, not rulings.
“Disputed” means the reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. It does not mean the claim is false. “Unverifiable” means no reachable source settled it either way.
Nothing here changes the page on its own. A proposed correction is applied only after a human moderator approves it; until then the page reads as it did when reviewed.
disputed
1 claimThe reviewer could not reconcile the claim with the evidence it cited. This is a lead, not a ruling that the claim is false.
- #6[disputed][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
“https://v1.skynet.cdn.certik.com/projects/fluent”
reviewerTimeline entry for the October 2026 social post cites the CertiK project page as its sourceThe source does not mention the social post. The event is labelled 'Requester context' and cannot be verified.
unverifiable
2 claimsNo source the reviewer could reach confirms or contradicts the claim.
- #4[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Token performance (BLEND)
“with 10 million tokens (1%) sold in a public sale at $0.10”
reviewerMainnet and BLEND launched April 2026 with a 10M-token public sale at $0.10The sale terms rest on a MEXC source that now returns 410. No independent source was retrieved for them. The page hedges with 'reportedly'. - #7[unverifiable][awaiting moderator]in section: Shutdown rumour status
“A social post by @Oxvietnguyen (reportedly about 126K views, October 2026) allegedly lists Fluent among chains with near-zero 24h revenue, small TVL and large FDV declines.”
reviewerA social post by @Oxvietnguyen with about 126K views lists Fluent among shutdown candidatesThe page itself says the post could not be located. The cited Crypto Times article is only context and was not re-fetched. The no-shutdown-announcement statement is a negative claim that I did not contradict.
link rot
1 claimA cited source no longer resolves or no longer says what the page attributes to it.
- #5[link rot][awaiting moderator]in the timeline
“https://www.mexc.com/news/65489”
reviewerTimeline source for mainnet/BLEND launch is deadCited URL is gone. No live replacement was found, so none is proposed.
partially supported
2 claimsThe cited evidence supports part of the claim but not all of it.
- #2[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Token performance (BLEND)
“Upbit listed BLEND in KRW, BTC and USDT markets on April 29, 2026.”
reviewerUpbit listed BLEND in KRW, BTC and USDT markets on April 29, 2026The source describes a planned rollout on that date. The page states it as completed. The CoinGabbar article on post-listing price action indirectly supports it. - #3[partially supported][awaiting moderator]in section: Usage, TVL and revenue
“a price of about $0.0685 and a market cap of about $13.59 million”
reviewerCertiK snapshot: about 700 active users, 1,861 transactions, price about $0.0685, market cap about $13.59MUsers and transactions match. Price and market cap differ slightly from the live page; the page already labels the snapshot as undated, so the discrepancy is minor.
confirmed
1 claimThe cited evidence supports the claim as written.
- #1[confirmed][no action needed]in section: Team and funding
“The Block reported on February 19, 2025 that Fluent Labs raised $8 million across seed and seed-extension rounds led by Polychain Capital”
reviewerFluent Labs raised $8M in seed and seed-extension rounds led by Polychain, announced February 2025The Block article matches the date, amount, investors, angels, 17 contributors and 60+ projects.